| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Washington State to Send Out Strike Teams to “Involuntarily Detain” Unvaccinated Residents and Ship Them to Quarantine Camps [ WAC 246-100-040 ], standing man wrote: |
I was on the zoom call regarding this issue, I think most of the discussion was a distraction except for item 9 on the agenda. Item 9 was replacing references to HIV aids in the original bill with the wording (blood borne pathogens). This would allow Wac 246-100 which was designed to protect the public from aids to be applied to covid. Covid is a respiratory virus but the virus is also carried in the blood stream making it a “blood borne pathogen “ DISCLOSURE I am not a Dr. Or virologist but this is my uneducated opinion on this issue |
Good post, standing man. I know they are up to something when they deny that such talk means ANYTHING AT ALL.
I think you nailed it - the other similar bill I posted was NYC updating their rules from the same era. I think they were piggy backing on the AIDS agenda intentionally (part of a plan to get people onboard with quarantining).
Then when their efforts are exposed, panic ensues "The Troglodytes think we intended to actually do something with the agenda item/amendment!!!"
-PJ
No, the NY bill you kept posting about, the one that never made it out committee (and therefore never enacted), and was withdrawn by its sponsor, had nothing to with AIDS. It was originally proposed during the Ebola outbreak and was all about Ebola.