To me, they sound too defensive, like Deep Staters yelling "Go back to sleeeeeeeep!"
To: ransomnote
2 posted on
02/16/2022 10:35:33 PM PST by
NetAddicted
( Just looking)
You need a spirit to be conscious.
3 posted on
02/16/2022 10:37:09 PM PST by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: ransomnote
I’ve already seen this movie. It doesn’t end well.
4 posted on
02/16/2022 10:38:19 PM PST by
broken_clock
(Go Trump! Still praying.)
To: ransomnote
laughable to a Christian, but the problem is they believe it because of their confirmation bias and spiritual blindness. may God help them come to real knowledge of conscience, conscientiousness, and salvation.
5 posted on
02/16/2022 10:45:12 PM PST by
dadfly
To: ransomnote
Being a professor in computer science does not make one an authority on consciousness. Its a Metaphysical issue explored by philosophers who very often disagree.
To: ransomnote
7 posted on
02/16/2022 11:13:37 PM PST by
BenLurkin
((The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.))
To: ransomnote
Dial F for Frankenstein was first published in the January 1964 issue of Playboy. Sir Arthur C. Clarke (1917-2008) is regarded as one of the most-influential science fiction writers of all time. He was named a Grand Master by the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America, and was inducted into the Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame.
Back when I was reading Playboy for the articles. ;-0
8 posted on
02/16/2022 11:14:40 PM PST by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
To: ransomnote
10 posted on
02/16/2022 11:36:09 PM PST by
GraceG
("If I post an AWESOME MEME, STEAL IT! JUST RE-POST IT IN TWO PLACES PLEASE")
To: ransomnote
11 posted on
02/16/2022 11:38:08 PM PST by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
To: ransomnote
Robots are Stealing my Luggage
12 posted on
02/16/2022 11:41:32 PM PST by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: ransomnote
It is impossible for a machine of any type to become “conscious”, firstly for the already-stated spiritual reasons, but also because computer code is nothing more than a glorified flow chart. Even the introduction of concepts like “fuzzy logic” is really nothing more than introducing randomness masquerading as ambiguity. But when that randomness produces unexpected output that mimics actual thought the materialistic “experts” get all excited.
Their foundational mistake is believing that the brain alone explains human consciousness, and that a sufficiently complex computer can therefore achieve consciousness. It’s all downhill from there. “Believing themselves to be wise, they became fools.”
14 posted on
02/16/2022 11:53:35 PM PST by
noiseman
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: ransomnote
Reminds me of Isaac Asimov's brilliant short story, "The Last Question."
Begins with, "The Last Question was asked for the first time in..."
And ends with, "Let There Be Light!"
Regards,
15 posted on
02/16/2022 11:56:45 PM PST by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: ransomnote
I am still waiting for my Mr. Fusion home nuclear reactor and my flying car.
Someday, long after we are all gone, AI technology may advance to the point where a vast computer network could have the same level of consciousness as a cockroach, but I doubt it. AI will get very good at emulating consciousness, but that is vastly different than actual consciousness.
16 posted on
02/17/2022 12:07:54 AM PST by
Bubba_Leroy
(Dementia Joe is Not My President)
To: ransomnote
I hope it doesn’t eat from The Tree Of The Knowledge Of Good And Evil or we’ll be really scrood.
20 posted on
02/17/2022 12:40:15 AM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: ransomnote
Consciousness is one of the last frontiers here on Earth.
Given that humans can't even define it adequately, how can we determine if AI has it (yet)?
As an aside, it is understandable that a robot might be more sentient than the average American Wokester.
To: ransomnote
27 posted on
02/17/2022 4:04:44 AM PST by
sauropod
(Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad. Life is risk, your highness.)
To: ransomnote
So which Michael Bolton song is your favorite
28 posted on
02/17/2022 4:38:39 AM PST by
Dartoid
To: ransomnote
Is there even a solid definition for “being conscience” that does not involve some esoterics?
29 posted on
02/17/2022 4:54:56 AM PST by
dartuser
To: ransomnote
31 posted on
02/17/2022 6:05:08 AM PST by
VTenigma
(The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged )
To: ransomnote
That’s absurd. It’s called ‘artificial intelligence’ for a reason.
35 posted on
02/17/2022 10:22:07 AM PST by
Bullish
(This is the most bloated and most inept govt in history.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson