ransomnote: The Expose is over the target and taking flak, banned and censored - even Paypal turned against them in an effort to deprive them of funding. Please pray that the Expose receive the funds it needs to keep serving the public.
Adults in England who have succumbed to three doses of the Covid-19 injections are now up to three times more likely to be infected with Covid-19 than adults who are not vaccinated, with the latest UK Health Security Agency showing the Covid-19 injections have a negative effectiveness among the triple vaccinated as low as minus-206%.
Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –
During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).
In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.
Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.
Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).
Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)
In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –
They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.
0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%
Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.
0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.
Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.
We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.
The reason we don’t need to go into it is because the general public are being told that the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is 95% effective due to the calculation performed above. The same calculation was also used based on individual results to claim a vaccine efficacy of around 70% for AstraZeneca, and around 98% for Moderna.
Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the new UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines.
Table 10 of the UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance report, published 17th February 2022, shows the number of recorded infections by vaccination status between week 3 and week 6 of 2022.
The vast majority of infections have been seen among the triple vaccinated and double vaccinated population, with 215,530 confirmed infections among the triple vaccinated 40-49-year-olds alone.
Covid-19 cultists would argue this is to be expected when so many people have chosen to get the Covid-19 injection, but unfortunately the UKHSA data confirms the Covid-19 cultists are wrong.
Table 13 of the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report shows the confirmed case rate among persons triple vaccinated, and rates among persons not vaccinated per 100,000 people.
As you can clearly see the case rate is highest among the triple vaccinated in all age groups except for the under 18’s.
Pfizer had an equal amount of people who had been vaccinated, and had not been vaccinated in the ongoing clinical trial in order to calculate the effectiveness of their vaccine, so in order to calculate the real-world effectiveness all we have to do is perform the same calculation using the rates per 100,000 numbers supplied by the UK Health Security Agency.
The following chart shows the real world vaccine effectiveness after three doses by age group in England between 26th Dec 21 and 13th Feb 22. We’ve taken the data from the Week 3 and Week 5 Vaccine Surveillance Reports, as well as from the table above to calculate the effectiveness during this period –
The only time vaccine effectiveness was shown to be positive among the triple vaccinated was between 26th Dec 21 and 16th Jan 22 among the 18-29 age group. But even then that positive effectiveness only equated to 10.19%. During the same period every other age group was showing a negative vaccine effectiveness, with the lowest recorded among the 60-69 age group at minus-104.69%.
However, between 9th Jan and 30th Jan 22, things shifted and the lowest recorded vaccine effectiveness was among the 40-49 age group at minus-120.28%. The +10.19% positive effectiveness in the 18-29 age group also fell to minus-29.8%.
But things took an even larger turn for the worse between 23rd Jan and 13th Feb 22 with the lowest vaccine effectiveness reaching minus-206.05% among the 40-49 age group, and the vaccine effectiveness fell to minus-120.36% among the 18-29 age group, after being +10.19% just weeks earlier.
This proves that the Covid-19 vaccines are making people more susceptible to catching Covid-19, rather than preventing cases of Covid-19 by the claimed 95%.
The new UK Health Security Agency report proves without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission, but it also suggests they are damaging the natural immune systems of recipients.
That’s because vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.
