Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex Offender Expresses Gratitude to Biden's SCOTUS Nominee for Only Giving Him a 3-Month Sentence
Western Journal ^ | Mar 26, 2022 | Jack Davis

Posted on 03/26/2022 7:51:34 PM PDT by upchuck

Sex offender Wesley Hawkins is now in the corner of the judge who once sentenced him to jail as Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson undergoes her Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

In 2013, Hawkins pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography, a felony. Jackson sentenced him to three months in jail, far below the sentencing guidelines of eight to 10 years and below the prosecution’s call for a two-year sentence.

The case has emerged as a major point of concern for Senate Republicans, who have noted that Jackson regularly offers lighter sentences to sex offenders than recommended in sentencing guidelines.

Hawkins has now said he has sympathy for Jackson as she is grilled about her logic in giving him such a light sentence, according to The Washington Post.

“I wasn’t very happy that she gave me three months, though, after reflection when I was in jail, I was hearing from other people who said it was their first time arrested and they got five years, six years,” he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: bidensbuttboys; bidensfanclub; cnnbias; kbj; ketanjibrownjackson; ketanjijackson; kidporno; paulryan; scotus; wisconsin; zotneocons

1 posted on 03/26/2022 7:51:34 PM PDT by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upchuck

“I wasn’t very happy that she gave me three months”

Not sensing a lot of remorse in this guy.


2 posted on 03/26/2022 7:57:02 PM PDT by BenLurkin ((The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

No mercy.


3 posted on 03/26/2022 8:00:53 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (None )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

He’s a pedophile. He will always be a pedophile.


4 posted on 03/26/2022 8:04:38 PM PDT by Smellin Salt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Wells let’s see. He was a man, aged 19. Judge Jackson opined from the depth of her wisdom that boys 8,11 and 12 were “essentially your peers.” We gotta have that level of erudition on the Supreme Court


5 posted on 03/26/2022 8:07:55 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (21 years on Free Republic, 12/10/21! More than 5000 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smellin Salt

A longer sentence would have really messed up his future plans...to acquire more kiddie porn.


6 posted on 03/26/2022 8:12:18 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

If these hearings are not over yet, this little item needs to be pointed out and emphasized for all the senators and the public to hear. She needs to be shamed, actually, for this egregiously short sentence.

It might not stop her race/gender driven confirmation, but it will leave a sour taste which it very definitely should!


7 posted on 03/26/2022 8:24:37 PM PDT by Deo volente ("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Why should he, he furthered the victimization of children and basically got a sentence for 90 days….

This woman should be nowhere near any bench. This one case alone (forget all the rest of her crap) should disqualify her…

But democrats don’t care about it.


8 posted on 03/26/2022 8:27:16 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Millstone. Neck. Ocean.


9 posted on 03/26/2022 8:33:06 PM PDT by waterhill (Resist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

How about he thanks KBJ in Congress in front of all...


10 posted on 03/26/2022 8:33:54 PM PDT by Conservat1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
It doesn't really matter anymore. She's got the votes and she'll be confirmed. I'm not very surprised. Our side is the only one whose members will defect on a confirmation vote.

She'll be on the court for decades whose vote will always be counted upon for every single issue, while our side has gadfly Gorsuch and the oddballs Kavanaugh and Barrett and every single important decision is always a guess as to how they will vote and will disappoint a good number of times.

I give the democrats credit - they are in your face and fearless while our side cowers in the corner.

11 posted on 03/26/2022 9:00:29 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
However, (in a 2019 report on the pedophile) it stated that “despite being in treatment for more than five years,” Hawkins “continues to seek out sexually arousing, non-pornographic material and images of males 13 to 16-years-old.”

No remorse because he's still involved.

12 posted on 03/26/2022 9:16:23 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

So that makes TWO pedophiles who are behind her nomination. (The first one should be very pleased to hear that when he returns to the White House tonight.)


13 posted on 03/26/2022 9:24:58 PM PDT by LittleBillyInfidel (This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Good thing the dims are fast tracking an candidate on the SCOUTUS for more anal rape of children. /sacarsm


14 posted on 03/26/2022 11:55:37 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

The GOP will vote for her confirmation, and then spend 30 years complaining that she always rules against conservative principles.


15 posted on 03/27/2022 12:14:35 AM PDT by KittyKares (Trump put us in the room; now we're putting ourselves in the room. - Steve Bannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

“ This seems to be a situation in which you were fascinated by sexual images involving what were essentially your peers,” she said. “And, as the psychological report concluded, there’s no reason to believe that you are a pedophile or that you pose any risk to children.”

Peers? 8 year olds are not peers to a 19 year old


16 posted on 03/27/2022 12:20:34 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Sounds like Kunta Kinte Jackson has quite a fan club following full of pedophiles out there. Pedophilia is the “next big thing” sweeping across the nation. Pretty soon the RAT politicians will be trying to legalize “medical pedophilia”.


17 posted on 03/27/2022 3:44:47 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Don't blame me, I voted for President Trump. Let's Go Brandon! FJB!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HollyB
Peers? 8 year olds are not peers to a 19 year old

Apparently Biden's square filler of color doesn't know the definition of a child either--then again she's not a gerontologist.

18 posted on 03/27/2022 4:56:28 AM PDT by DaBroasta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Pedos gonna stick together. Democrats love pedos so much they made on president. Disgusting degenerates.


19 posted on 03/27/2022 5:22:58 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson