Walgreens – Unvaxxed are testing positive for Covid-19 at the lowest rate, Triple Vaxxed at the highest

National Conservative ^ | 5-8-22 | National Conservative

[dynachrome]

Walgreens publishes data on their Covid-19 tests. When people took the test, they asked if their vaccinated. In both of the last two updates, the unvaccinated tested positive at the lowest rate. People with three doses tested positive at the highest rate.

Rates of COVID Positivity 4/27 – 5/3

Not Vaccinated – 16.3% 1 Dose – 21.5% 2 Dose > 5m ago – 26.7% 2 Dose <= 5m ago – 20.2% 3 Dose > 5m ago – 30.1% 3 Dose <= 5m ago – 20.8%

[dynachrome]

Unexpected!

[dynachrome]

Link to Walgreen charts. Page 3 shows this info.

https://www.walgreens.com/businesssolutions/covid-19-index.jsp

[lee martell]

The loudly whispered truth!

[nickcarraway]

Is it the percentage of people who test positive, or the percentage of people within that status group? There are supposed to be a lot more vaccinated people.

[Grampa Dave]

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

Thanks for the source AND information.

The EUA was about being justified as a prevention, though the rhetoric has strayed form that long back.

One sees that those who have avoided the mRNA experiment are not only the lowest of the six groups, but 82.9 percent showing positivity at a higher rate that those who refused the experiment PROVES the experiment is a failure.

Unless scaring a world full of people and making billions for something essentially less than worthless -- harmful for some and deadly for some -- was the fraudulent goal. Fraud eviscerates liability shields, and so going forward law suits will abound, it is assured.

Again thanks for the data and the URL source.

[ArcadeQuarters]

Would it help if purebloods donated blood to those who were duped?

[Grampa Dave]

So, is a higher positivity rate a good thing or a bad thing post vaccination?

[sevlex]

The sanctimonius karens would probably refuse it.

[Big Red Badger]

Thanks Gramps

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

(From the article):" Walgreens publishes data on their Covid-19 tests. When people took the test, they asked if their vaccinated.
In both of the last two updates, the unvaccinated tested positive at the lowest rate.
People with three doses tested positive at the highest rate."

"Rates of COVID Positivity 4/27 – 5/3
Not Vaccinated – 16.3%
1 Dose – 21.5%
2 Dose > 5m ago – 26.7%
2 Dose <= 5m ago – 20.2%
3 Dose > 5m ago – 30.1%
3 Dose <= 5m ago – 20.8% "

(My Comment): You won't see this report in the media
I wonder if this has been reported to the FDA/CDC yet,
and if so, would you expect the FDA/CDC to report this news ?
Pfizer ?

[Big Red Badger]

Ain’t donating my
Pure Blood unless they do
A Remake of “Omega Man!”

[steve86]

“they asked if their (sic) vaccinated.”

[E. Pluribus Unum]

[stormhill]

Rates of COVID Positivity 4/27 – 5/3

Not Vaccinated – 16.3%
1 Dose – 21.5%
2 Dose > 5m ago – 26.7%
2 Dose <= 5m ago – 20.2%
3 Dose > 5m ago – 30.1%
3 Dose <= 5m ago – 20.8%

[Big Red Badger]

What’s that;
(<5M ago,etc.) ??

[dynoman]

It’s bad. It means the vaccine totally crapped the bed.

If you go to page three andclick “proportion of tests” and see the double dosed are 3-4% of those tested but have 20% of the covid positives!

[AlaskaErik]

Looking at the numbers it appears that any short-term benefit is negated by a much higher chance of contracting Covid if you don’t continue getting boosters. This tells me that taking the needle compromises the immune system in the long run as you can see those who received two or three shots, with the last shot occurring over five months ago, have the highest infection rates.

[dynoman]

click “proportion of tests” too! It’s even worse. 2 Dose <= 5m ago is 3%-4% of those tested but have 20% of the positives!

[Jim Noble]

Is it the percentage of people who test positive, or the percentage of people within that status group?

Oh you and your statistics!

I suppose next you'll be going on about the undistributed mean!