PING
How about credible sources for such the extreme claim. I’m not doubting the claim, but if 90% yes, that would be big news.
If this is proven to be accurate, I hope and pray that heads will roll. All of the media, the so called doctors and scientists, the government, etc. they own it.
****
Smells like crimes against humanity.
270 pregnancies. 238 outcomes not reported.
And they conclude that almost all of them did not make it to term?
This is not good science. It’s like saying, “100% of the people that died are dead.”
I’ve always been a big vaxx skeptic from the start, but I take anything from the dailyexpose with a grain of salt. They have a history of misinterpreting data to push their narrative.
The mRNA shot propensity for killing babies is a feature and not a side effect.
This is not to say that there isn’t anything to this, but the headline is very misleading. And the article misrepresents the data.
First of all spontaneous miscarriage is not uncommon - 2/3 of pregnancies end in miscarriage, albeit before the mother even knows she’s pregnant in many cases.
Of the 260+ pregnancies, 238 were not included in the reporting, and of the 32 others, likely they were only notable because there was an issue. There isn’t enough data here to come to any certain conclusions.
In the Scottish data, they show two spikes above the apparent usual distribution - but they also omit two full years worth of data right in the middle (2019-2020). That is a huge red flag. Why are those years missing? There is no good reason other than to mislead (looking for this is taught in the first week of a statistics course).
And those are just the problems I noted from a quick perusal of the article. This is just crap reporting.
Those women protesting the Supreme Court must be ecstatic over these numbers. Not quite as efficient as Planned Parenthood, but pretty darn close. And it kills babies of pro-lifers as a bonus.