Robert’s is such a fake.
What if “Roberts” is completely compromised?
You are wasting your time.
I’ve been pondering what kind of crap show it would have been without the leak. If this ruling came out with no warning. Can you imagine what that would have been like? Everyone expecting a “split the baby” ruling, only to have the whole thing tossed out. At least the leak tempered the riots a little (alas, it also gave them some extra time to prepare, though).
I agree with your suspicions: Chief Justice Robert’s is owned by the Left because he visited Jeffrey Epstein’s island, and they have the dirt on him. It explains almost all of his “peculiar” behavior while on the SCOTUS.
I don’t know if I agree with your supposition or not.
But Roberts ain’t exactly as promised in the sales brochure. If we could trade him in on a new & better model, I would back anyone nominated by a Trump or a DeSantis. Or about 8 to 10 other MAGA Republicans.
We do need to “Stay out of the Bushes”
Roberts did *not* vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.
He wrote a separate opinion in which he did uphold the Mississippi law that restricted abortion, but that’s as far as he was willing to go.
“*There have also been rumors that Roberts tried to convince at least one associate justice to change their vote.”
I’m suspecting that Trump’s appointees are pretty damn pissed that they listened to Roberts in rejecting the Texas election case...considering what the country has become because of it. The reason for that rejection was, as reported, as that ruling in favor of Texas would cause ‘the cities to burn’.
He likely tried that stunt with Roe...but one big problem in the end, the people who burn down our cities are not even visible during the Roe protests - not even 1% of the protesters.
The SCOTUS leak happened at 7PM May 2nd... The EXACT time 2000 Mules premiered on select theaters. The leak was planned to distract from the proof the election was stolen. Bring this up in every discussion on the SCOTUS leak and decision on Roe v Wade.
Without evidence, such rumors should not be repeated. With evidence, they should be investigated.
How about:
After the Row v Wade leak, a new and \violent organization\ called Jane’s Revenge began attacking and burning Pro-life facilities, mostly in the US Northwest.
To those of you in Rio Linda, Jane’s Revenge was given carte-blanche after the leak to terrorize America and make them [us] fear the overturn of RvW.
It gave them political street cred, meaning they won’t be designated a “domestic terror” group.
We will find out that Jane’s Revenge is an operational arm of ANTIFA and funded entirely by George Soros.
I don’t think it was Roberts. If he was the leaker the Left would reveal it, Roberts would have to resign in disgrace, and Dementia Joe would get a new Supreme Court pick.
I’ve been complaining about the loss of interest in who leaked this info for weeks. There is something very funny going on here. In the absence of gross incompetence by the DOJ (a real possibility), there is no way the identity of the leaker is still unknown, yet it has not been revealed. WHY. If either the RAT party or the Repubs knew the identity and it gave them an advantage it would instantly be made public (especially in an election year). One explanation is that the info benefits neither party but would harm some SC intern/law clerk that is liked by both sides. Knowing that the info would ruin his career both sides has agreed to keep silent (as well as the left and right media).
I think it was mentioned during the ACA fiasco that Robertss adopted a child from Ireland and had the paperwork go through another country because is was illigal at the time, I haven’t been able to substantiate.
“There have been rumors that Roberts visited pedo island and that, as a result, the left owns him.”
Yup, rumors. Unless you have proof, you are one of those who are spreading rumors.
I’ve already beat you to this.
I was the first person on the internet to say that Roberts may have leaked this himself.
RINO Roberts (appointed by GW Bush) = RINO Souter (appointed by GHW Bush). The Bushes knew how to pick ‘em.
If Roberts leaked the draft in an attempt to sway one or more of the other five justices, it would be highly likely that their reaction would be the exact opposite of what he intended.
1. The justices would lose confidence in each other, and in HIM.
2. They would likely be very pissed off at him.
3. They would see the failure to identify the "leaker" as an indictment of him as the Chief Justice.
No, he didn't. He voted to leave the 15 week law (Mississippi?) in tact (6-3), but voted to keep Roe (5-4).
I’m sure they found out who it was within a few days, they just decided to cover it up, probably even let the leaker stay in place.
Most of his decisions have less to do with the application of the law in an originalist or textualist manner and more to do with making the least upheaval of the status quo. He seeks to be a compromiser, but I think his ability to do that is quickly slipping away.