Posted on 06/28/2022 8:48:51 PM PDT by Morgana
Meghan Markle has urged men to be 'more vocal' with their anger at the repealing of Roe v. Wade, as she revealed that Prince Harry's response to the news on Friday was 'guttural'.
The Duchess of Sussex, 40, spoke to Vogue magazine in conversation with author and activist Gloria Steinem, 88, and journalist Jessica Yellin.
Steinem declared the day after Friday's ruling that she would welcome women traveling to New York for an abortion into her own Manhattan home.
She said that her husband was a feminist, and he reacted with anger to the Supreme Court's decision.
Markle said that all men need to join women in the fight to protect abortion rights.
'Men need to be vocal in this moment and beyond because these are decisions that affect relationships, families, and communities at large,' she said.
'They may target women, but the consequences impact all of us.
'My husband and I talked about that a lot over the past few days. He's a feminist too.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Shut up Megan!
Have you cut his bollocks off yet? When does his "transition" begin?
Oh yeah sure of course.
“Harry, you better be mad about this”
“Shaw! I’m madder than a wet settin hen. I’m madder than two cats with their tails tied together and thrown over a clothesline. I’m madder than a Chihuahua at anything”
You know. The one drop rule African American duchess who looks whiter than most white poeple from south of Calais. /snicker
they have changed the title..I hope Obama puts a stop to it
‘We’ll be going to DC together soon’: Meghan Markle hints at presidential ambitions and urges voters to ‘take action’ over Roe v Wade abortion ruling - as she tells activist Gloria Steinem ‘feminist’ Harry is ‘guttural’
More like a gold digger who reeled in a big fish.
Says the woman who broke up two families and won’t speak to her own ailing father.
“Princess Slut “
Lifetime Movie Channel title?
ya i know, but during WW1 the then king changed it. :-(
The next to the last paragraph of the article poses a fascinating question...
...It has led some within the household to ask the question: is how your staff are treated and protected really deemed less important than angering the Sussexes?...
And the answer to that is yes.
Q for the House of Windsor: What could the Harkles know that gives them that much power...
Now that I’m thinking about it, here’s another question...
Are the Harkles covered by the Official Secrets Act?
If not, why not?
If so, why not use that to muzzle them?
But Harry's just taking after his dad...
Check out the bit about Chuck's good bud, Van Der Post, and the 14 year old girl...
Extra asterisk mine.
Two points of special interest. Markle doesn't seem to have a very good opinion of Canadian women. And who owned the private plane that gave eco hypocrite Markle the free ride to the Inskip wedding.
And if what’s being reported is in the book and is accurate, she has quite the track record for treating people like crap.
Prince Cuck
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.