Posted on 07/14/2022 8:00:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
In September 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was caught stealthily changing the definition of the word “vaccine,” as well as what it means to be “fully vaccinated,” because the experimental mRNA jab was not meeting the well-established criteria under the old definition – and people were taking notice.
Unfortunately for the so-called ‘experts,’ independent journalist Alex Berenson ensured the change did not fly under the radar, as reported by TGP’s Larry Johnson. For sounding the alarm on the CDC’s change, Berenson was suspended permanently from Twitter – but, following a court settlement earlier this month, his account was reinstated.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Without the change in definition, was it illegal to approve for use?
Orwellian: When a ‘vaccine’ is not a vaccine.
Of interest (Anonymous was eventually identified as a Nurse) —> https://americasbestpics.com/picture/among-all-the-vaccines-i-have-known-in-my-life-vwM4gTKF9
“Without the change in definition, was it illegal to approve for use?”
Legal. Article is much todo about nothing.
Changing the meaning of words to force people to take a shot undermines every principle of written law.
Because the words of the law are its meaning.
Progressives have made an art out of changing the meaning words to mean the opposite of what they really mean. I can remember when gay meant to be happy.
The truth about the clot shots is starting to come out.
Does the covid vaccine even fit the current revised definition?
P
Yet the covid cultist jab lovers here on FR denied the definition ever changed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.