Documents leaked from the EMA confirms why we aren't allowed to analyze the vaccine vials

substack.com ^ | August 31, 2022 | Steve Kirsch

[ransomnote]

It's like rolling the dice for what you get in your vial. Both the FDA and EMA knew this but kept this out of the public view because if it were known, nobody would take the vaccines.

Steve Kirsch

Aug 31

 

One of my readers has been trying to get my attention for 8 months on the EMA data leak that happened nearly 2 years ago.

He recently posted this substack article documenting his attempts to get visibility on what the EMA document leak revealed.

The gem in the article is this video which was posted 18 months ago that few people have seen. The video is just 14 minutes long and is very well done. The findings are all consistent with what I and others have long suspected: the vials are all different.

The key finding is the reason they won’t let anyone analyze the vials: mRNA is not intact. The BMJ wrote about this on March 10, 2021 [my comments are in brackets]:

1. On Nov 23, 2020, EMA knew about the quality control issues with severely compromised mRNA integrity (ranging from 78% to 55%). [It’s supposed to be 100% if you want an effective vaccine.]

2. Just two days later, a source in the US said the lots were now “back at around 70-75%, which leaves us cautiously optimistic that additional data could address the issue.”

3. “The complete, intact mRNA molecule is essential to its potency as a vaccine,” professor of biopharmaceutics Daan J.A. Crommelin and colleagues wrote in a review article in The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences late last year.”

4. The BMJ asked Pfizer, Moderna, and CureVac, as well as several regulators, what percentage mRNA integrity they consider acceptable for vaccines against covid-19. None offered any specifics. [“Wow, that’s really comforting. <sarcasm off>”]

5. The EMA told The BMJ that the levels of truncated mRNA “and the amounts of a potential protein produced by the truncated mRNA would be too low to constitute a safety risk.” [uh… how does the EMA know that exactly?]

6. Health Canada told The BMJ that Pfizer had conducted investigations into the root cause of reduced integrity in the commercial vaccine batches, and “changes were made in their processes to ensure that the integrity was improved and brought in line with what was seen for clinical trial batches.” Health Canada said the three agencies subsequently determined that “there was no concern with the RNA integrity or any other product specifications.” [Whew! Now I’m relieved! No data on the new levels produced. If you can’t trust Pfizer, who can you trust?]

In general, the BMJ wasn’t happy about anything they heard from the regulators. They were basically stonewalled in their requests.

The fact that it’s illegal for anyone to analyze the vials (they are government property) doesn’t help inspire confidence at all.

Even if you are getting 100% intact mRNA which would be really rare, you’re still not getting anything that resembles the virus. So the efficacy as far as PROTECTING you will be next to nothing. However, what it will do very effectively, if you got reasonably intact mRNA, is to cause you significant harm. You are playing a game of chance with your immune system and what is in the bottle.

MORE AT LINK, INCLUDING LIST OF 12 VIDEO HILIGHTS: Documents leaked from the EMA confirms why we aren't allowed to analyze the vaccine vials

 

[ransomnote]

The Expose website hosted an article by Dr. Yeadon, former Chief of Allergy and Infectious Diseases division of Pfizer, in which he explained why the vials of Covid 'vaccines' must (logically) contain differing amounts of chemicals, contents etc. The manufacturing process is far, far too controlled to explain why some vaccine lots have much higher rates of adverse events following vaccination.

To check your vaccine lot number to see if it perhaps was low or high on the number of patients reporting adverse events, search the database here: How harmful is my COVID-19 Vaccine Batch? – FIND OUT NOW…

 

[ransomnote]

PING

[LeoTDB69]

Well my vaccine lot # was, oh I forgot, I never took the clot shot.

[for-q-clinton]

But those that took the injection and boosters won’t admit it. They hate to realize they took poison into their bodies. Instead they will “trust the fake science”.

[algore]

Not that matters, but it seems like a trendy thing.

You have to pass the bill before you can know what is in it

Or. We redacted everything from the warrent that allowed us to go full Swat on you and your property.

Or from today, we took half the inheritance your grandfather left you, but that is a fine so totally legal. Be glad we did not take it all

[metmom]

I find it interesting that one of the arguments for taking the vax was to prevent damage to your body from Covid. Covid was reported to cause heart problems and blood clotting.

So they pushed the vax as a preventative for Covid. Get the vax and you won’t get Covid.

Problem is, the vax gives the same problems as Covid allegedly does.

So, since the vax does not prevent Covid, by the CDC’s own admission, by taking the vax, you are in fact doubling your risk of heart problems and blood clots. Once from the vax and once from Covid.

If you simply caught Covid, the you could have that risk one time, but by taking the vax, you essentially doubled that risk, you are taking that risk two times.

[metmom]

Or from today, we took half the inheritance your grandfather left you, but that is a fine so totally legal. Be glad we did not take it all

What is that all about?

Did I miss something in the news?

[algore]

probably, I thought I saw it here, but the article was not good so I will post it again

[FormerFRLurker]

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4090180/posts

[FormerFRLurker]

Trump told Alex Jones to shut up and stop asking questions about “his” vaccine.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4089368/posts

[metmom]

That is beyond reprehensible.

[cuz1961]

So, basically,

It was russian roulette with a saw with a 100 round belt with 80 duds and 20 live rounds.

Must be why the endless boosters,,, enough tries and sooner or later

BANG.

[ransomnote]

PING

[Deaf and Discerning]

As a reminder, the flu vaccines were never entirely effective. As per CDC:

... recent studies show that flu vaccination reduces the risk of flu illness by between 40% and 60% among the overall population... (Aug. 25)

As more and more reports arise about how deadly these Covid vaccines could be (and the growing suspicion that vaccines were designed to be more deadly, is it possible these "designers" are thinking they are not killing us off fast enough?

Couldn't CDC - or some liberal employee in NIAID’s Vaccine Research Center - deliberately sneak something in the flu shot's design to do same thing?

Do you trust this year's flu shot? (You all know how I feel: "Don't fix what ain't broken")

D&D

[ransomnote]

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Documents leaked from the EMA confirms why we aren't allowed to analyze the vaccine vials, Deaf and Discerning wrote:

As a reminder, the flu vaccines were never entirely effective. As per CDC:

... recent studies show that flu vaccination reduces the risk of flu illness by between 40% and 60% among the overall population... (Aug. 25)

As more and more reports arise about how deadly these Covid vaccines could be (and the growing suspicion that vaccines were designed to be more deadly, is it possible these "designers" are thinking they are not killing us off fast enough?

Couldn't CDC - or some liberal employee in NIAID’s Vaccine Research Center - deliberately sneak something in the flu shot's design to do same thing?

Do you trust this year's flu shot? (You all know how I feel: "Don't fix what ain't broken")

D&D

There's no reason to  trust the flu shot - the same people are behind it as the ones driving the toxic Covid 'vaccine' programs. They didn't make their targeted 80% vaccination goal in the US but they're trying.

Fauci said last year or in early 2022, "Hmmm...I'm thinking about combining the flu shot with the Covid 'vaccine'....."

Enough said.

The contents of the Covid 'vaccine' vials vary. Not everyone gets the same shot. So, why play Russian Roulette with the clowns?