Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Openurmind

In the end this episode was just content. She could’ve left and bought food right next door I’m sure but she saw an opportunity to hassle fast food workers for tik tok views over their policy design to keep vagrants away from the store. She should’ve respected the policy. Period.


5 posted on 09/06/2022 4:09:16 AM PDT by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: MrRelevant

Or just ordered extra on her own order and giving it to him after. Them knowing she was buying it for him was the issue.

I have a feeling there were antisoliciting codes in effect and this guy was a persistent soliciting problem.

More than likely the law was called on him for solicitation more so than on her for trying to help him.


10 posted on 09/06/2022 4:24:21 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MrRelevant

Here is the deal. I have had similar happen at my business. In some states like Ca when you are open for business your business is public access that cannot be denied. Your only tool to remove someone for trespassing is to close up shop to the general public altogether first. Or you can refuse them service and stay open, but you cannot make them leave unless you close. Closing up completely will hit profits so it is more practical to refuse service.


17 posted on 09/06/2022 4:37:21 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson