[marktwain]

A strongly stated, Third Circuit precedent for protecting Second Amendment rights as civil rights in the courts.

[Howie66]

Since what time has this Federal Leviathan given two hoots in Hell about any Constitutional restraints on their actions?

[Lazamataz]

You know, it should be — and is — obvious that the government, these days, is simply a bad actor. It is malevolent and malicious.

[bert]

What of the takings from Mar al Lago. The weaponized law crapped on the constitutuin

Heads must roll........ literally. The AG forfeited his right to life

[Jim W N]

Don’t forget the 4th amendment’s reminder of the people’s right to be “secure in their person’s, houses, papers, and effects”.

Also don’t forget, the Constitution delegates certain limited powers enumerated to the feds mostly in Art I, Sec 8. IF IT’S NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION, IT IS NOT A FEDERAL POWER!!! REPEAT THAT OVER AND OVER!!!

The Left has successfully twisted this around so that many think forbidden federal powers must be in the first ten Amendments. READ AMENDMENTS IV AND V which confirm what I am saying.

In America, the people, NOT government, begin with all God-given liberties and rights per the Declaration of Independence. The People via the limited powers enumerated in the Constitution delegate and give up ONLY those enumerated rights in the Constitution to the feds.

In America, God, not man or his government, gives the people their rights and freedoms. The first ten amendments are meant to REMIND the feds of what they can’t do. Again READ AMENDMENTS IV AND V for confirmation of this.

[IYAS9YAS]

The takings clause should also apply to things that were legal when purchased but now the All The Fools bunch deem to be machine guns.

[muir_redwoods]

The larger the government entity the less likely it is to play by the rules. The basic rule of “innocent until proven guilty” has been ignored by the IRS since it originated.

[DownInFlames]

We are now living in an era where the court rulings mean nothing to the state.

[The Sons of Liberty]

Ownership of Arms Protected by Takings Clause, 2nd and 14th Amendments

Since WHEN has the Biden Regime started abiding by The Constitution?

[DPMD]

The takings clause might very well be a victim to the fact that certain members of the “takers” may have added the firearms to their personal collections. It’s a part of a pattern, a genesis of which is the asset forfeiture laws and the resultant enriching of police departments, and, by extension, their members most likely.

[3RIVRS]

I’m more concerned why the first court sided with the commonwealth.