Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maidstone Couple Fight For Compensation From David LloydFfitness Club After £30,000 Rolex Watch Stolen From Locker
KentOnline ^ | 13 September 2022 | Ben Austin

Posted on 09/13/2022 7:33:13 PM PDT by nickcarraway

A couple are locked in a battle with a fitness club chain after a £30,000 Rolex watch was stolen from a locker room.

Lee Briggs visited the David Lloyd health club in Kings Hill on June 6 this year to play tennis with his business partner.

He entered the locker room to get changed and stashed his Rolex in his shoe before putting it in a locker - securing it with a padlock bought from the club.

He was gone for 30 minutes but during that time the locker was broken into and the watch stolen.

Mr Briggs, 40, says he had only got the watch in February, having been on a waiting list for the limited edition timepiece.

Three months later, he and his wife Emma say they are still hoping for compensation from the gym.

Emma said: "It's not nice having something stolen that you worked so hard for and was on a waiting list to get."

The couple say a man was spotted acting suspiciously on CCTV at the time of the incident but he has not yet been identified.

To get into the club, visitors either need to have a membership ID to show to reception or sign in as a guest under the supervision of a member - two things the suspect didn't do, which Emma says was later confirmed by police.

In a message to the couple seen by KentOnline, police say investigating officers spoke with reception staff about a man who was waved through on the basis that he had just stepped out to take a call and had left his ID in the changing room.

The same suspicious man was also spotted on CCTV purchasing an item from the café.

Police hoped an identity could be found from his bank card but when they asked David Lloyd to check the transactions from that day it was unable to do so.

The couple, from Maidstone, are now hoping for some form of compensation from the fitness chain, accusing the club of negligence over the loss of the watch.

Mrs Briggs said: "I can't just enter the club with my husband as a guest without signing in so how has this person entered unchallenged? Had they not let him in, my husband would still have his watch.

"Not only did they let someone in but let him in with a dangerous weapon in bolt-cutters as the padlock was removed and taken.

"There's a nursery in there too with children so I just can't see how they can do that."

But the fitness chain has stated that it is not liable for loss of damage in its terms and conditions.

In it, the club states: "We do not accept liability for damage or loss to your property or a guest’s property that may happen on the premises or within the grounds of your club or any other David Lloyd Club, other than the liability which arises from our negligence or our failure to take reasonable care."

KentOnline has contacted the company several times for response but is yet to receive a comment.

The couple say they are in the process of claiming the loss of the watch on their home insurance but are still seeking legal advice.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News; Sports
KEYWORDS: aggrandizement; fakenews; fraud; gym; lawsuits; ostentation; rolex
I'm not sure I'd be comfortable leaving a $30k watch in a locker. I'm not sure if I'd be comfortable wearing a $30k watch at all.
1 posted on 09/13/2022 7:33:13 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Right. Who does that. Really. I smell a rat.


2 posted on 09/13/2022 7:37:59 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.6.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hey, it was protected by a five dollar padlock! One provided by the club.


3 posted on 09/13/2022 7:40:10 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Yes, who takes a watch that expensive to a gym and puts it in a locker?


4 posted on 09/13/2022 7:43:18 PM PDT by Gnome1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

I would have left it locked in my car


5 posted on 09/13/2022 7:43:33 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (The 2020 election Trump victory determines the fate f America and Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gnome1949; hinckley buzzard

Some people are showoffs.


6 posted on 09/13/2022 7:43:51 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Fast watch sale?


7 posted on 09/13/2022 7:44:01 PM PDT by arthurus (covfefe .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I doubt if that ex watch owner gets his 30K Euros.
Most gyms with public lockers have signs posted saying they are not responsible for thefts or property damage to stored items. In addition, who says he ever had such a watch in the first place? Maybe he’s attempting a quick shake down based on a few well told lies and idle threats.


8 posted on 09/13/2022 7:45:52 PM PDT by lee martell ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

If he claims he was on the waitlist, he may have prove he bought it.


9 posted on 09/13/2022 7:46:41 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Nope.


10 posted on 09/13/2022 7:54:31 PM PDT by eyedigress (Trump is my President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Either too stupid to own a $30k watch or a big risk of insurance fraud.


11 posted on 09/13/2022 7:57:07 PM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

He’s stupid enough to leave that in a locker? He should have at least had it insured against theft.


12 posted on 09/13/2022 8:13:46 PM PDT by Bullish (Rot'sa Ruck America. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell; hinckley buzzard
In addition, who says he ever had such a watch in the first place?

So, the guy was out for 30 minutes? Did he advertise the fact that he was putting his watch in his shoe? How did the thief know it was as there? Did he break into any other lockers? How did he know about this particular locker? You may be right HB. Doesn’t pass the smell test.

13 posted on 09/13/2022 8:20:26 PM PDT by Mark17 (Retired USAF air traffic controller. Father of USAF pilot. USAF aviation runs in the family )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Precisely. What an idiot


14 posted on 09/13/2022 8:36:20 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17; lee martell; hinckley buzzard

There is a chance he’s the kind of jerk who always brags about his watch, so some of the other members of the club waited until he left the locker room and took it.


15 posted on 09/13/2022 8:55:15 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Could be something like that too.


16 posted on 09/13/2022 9:57:15 PM PDT by Mark17 (Retired USAF air traffic controller. Father of USAF pilot. USAF aviation runs in the family )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Yeah I realize that someone who has $30,000 to spend on a watch has the freedom to do so. But, a $30 watch from Walmart works just as well. I question the judgement of this guy on every aspect of his life choices. From purchasing the dang thing in the first place, to wearing it to the gym, to leaving it in a locker with a cheap lock provided by someone else, and for letting the world know how stupid he is by admitting all of the above.


17 posted on 09/13/2022 10:05:23 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"Not only did they let someone in but let him in with a dangerous weapon in bolt-cutters as the padlock was removed and taken.

How many people were assaulted with bolt cutters in the U.S. last year?

Certainly fewer than were attacked by people wielding tennis rackets!

So tennis rackets are, in fact, more-dangerous weapons than bolt cutters, and should hence be banned on the premises of health clubs.

Regards,

18 posted on 09/14/2022 1:00:56 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson