not guilty
Many Californians have soy for spines.
I thought California had a “He needed killin’” defense left over from SPanish colonialism.
Don’t tell me. He had it coming and it served him right. Right?
Now, to go read the article.
Probably impossible to get a unanimous verdict for manslaughter.
Regardless, jury nullification cuts both ways.
A lot of people at Free Republic support the idea that child molesters can be lawfully murdered by parents or vigilantes or prison inmates.
But, if we support that conduct, how can we then respond in good conscience when laws that Conservatives support are nullified by judges and juries of our political opponents?
Her actions were neither a crime nor self-defense.
I would vote not guilty as well.
The heat of passion argument works for me. If I found out someone had molested my kids, I could understand her actions.
When I was a kid in Jackson Mississippi all rich women got off for killing husbands
Pendergrass
Bush
Those two come to mind
I wish they applied this to men who deal with cheating wives and their affair partners.
Or men in general. If you dont have boobs and a kitty, you don’t get this favorable behavior from gynosociety.
And to be clear I’m not at all bothered what she did if he actually did it and the girl wasn’t framing him. Which does occur. Which is generally why we don’t let people take it on themselves to go murder other people on the words of someone else.
Not Guilty.......and not for the usual reason.
She did the world a favor by stopping this scumbag from stealing any more oxygen.
Not guilty
But he “LOVED” my daughter!