Posted on 01/23/2023 2:29:06 PM PST by nickcarraway
that theory has no scientific evidence to support it
Thanks!
Lizzie (the writer of this article) didn’t get the memo that the term “conspiracy theorists” was wore out and over used by lefty/marxists.
As a result, the term has no meaning anymore.
Occasionally.
Just as we heard of healthy people dying of the flu or of athletes dropping dead on the field.
But it did not happen that often.
And that is the point.
Not that it never happened before in the history of the world but that it went from really rare to rare to almost daily.
When you see an up tick then something has changed and you should be curious as to what it is.
The counting on that side isn’t accurate.
Before I retired recently, a friend of mine in my former job did develop a heart condition and now needs medication. 1+ year so far.
He’s only 40, developed the problem about 1 month after the vaccine, but our employer did ZERO to collect that metric and not even VAERS or whatever that BS is catches that statistic because they simply do not correlate a 40 year old developing a sudden heart condition 1 month after the vaccine as being caused by that vaccine.
It’s all in how you want to count things.
Just like the number of Covid deaths were greatly inflated early on when anyone that sneezed was counted (before the test all you needed to be counted were Covid symptoms, which of course could also be the flu, a cold...)... Or anyone that died of nearly any cause but had Covid symptoms was counted as a Covid death, creating these ridiculous high mortality rates.
But it’s all science!
Not going to go to "Slate" to find out how they gin up that chart, but what's interesting is the qualifying phrase "(of whatever cause)". Whatever their data arises from, to get the result they want they probably can't focus on susceptibility to Covid or adverse reactions to the jab. They have to bring in "whatever" to make their case.
no... UNEXPECTEDLY comes up a LOT tooo...
Most of those who actually died of COVID had serious underlying health conditions.
Most of those who ‘died suddenly’ were young or middle age, jabbed once or more, and didn’t seem to have any serious underlying health conditions.
In 2020 there were 3.4 million US deaths. Total. All ages.
A few hundred thousand at younger age is normal. The majority of deaths is 65+, but it’s not overwhelming, like 95% or something.
Methinks Lizzie O’Leary is a mid-wit.
is Suddenly deadlier because it’s so sudden?
Or is the dreaded Unexpectedly worse???
I like using the phrase “safe and effective” more.
You may disbelieve everything, but your average voter believes charts. I tried to warn Ya’ll the media was showing more deaths, listing them as sudden or unexpected (when a bit of research showed they weren’t). They let you run and now they’ll beat you with it. For such smart folks, it seems Ya’ll walk into every trap they set. Santos is another set up. Carry on. I’ll be prepping for another 4 years of dem rule, Yay /s
https://airtable.com/shrbaT4x8LG8EbvVG/tbl7xKsSUIOPAa7Mx
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=student+dies+suddenly+cardiac
The repeated, seemingly enthusiastic or intentional use of the phrase in major media reports, followed by articles like this, is an especially in-your-face form of public gaslighting.
Actually the media are the ones using the “died suddenly” phrase
Not favorite, but accurate.
I am pretty certain Sudden Adult Death Syndrome has been featured more in the recent medical lexicon.
The favorite phrase of the jabbed is becoming
THUD.
And on statistics and how they may be manipulated to show desired conclusions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.