Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

I don’t think that is the issue. Roosevelt’s point is that Jackson had dual English American citizenship.

While we generally accept that Jackson was born a long the South Carolina/North Carolina border back in 1859 there were questions of whether he was actually born at sea.

https://books.google.com/books?id=Y3sFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA148&dq=was+andrew+jackson+born+at+sea&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj55PLo6PL8AhVROEQIHSCMAoIQ6AF6BAgHEAM#v=onepage&q=was%20andrew%20jackson%20born%20at%20sea&f=false


127 posted on 01/31/2023 2:18:12 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan
The point is that everyone could be considered dual citizens prior to the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. That's why the grandfather clause was there to exempt them from the natural born citizen requirement.

Jackson was born in 1767 somewhere in the Carolinas. His parents emigrated from Ireland in 1765.

I'm not sure if the South Carolina constitution had citizenship requirements or not, so I'm assuming that Jackson and his parents were considered citizens of the United States in 1789.

-PJ

128 posted on 01/31/2023 2:41:02 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson