Posted on 02/02/2023 5:40:57 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski
I don’t know, maybe climate is a complex thing that depends on more than one variable?
Facts don’t matter-—their ends justify their means——which means “if the facts don’t fit the narrative then double down on lying”.
I think these “Scientists” require more grant money to study the issue.
(S)
But they keep focusing on the one area of the Antarctic that has some ice shelf breaking off; it’s located directly above massive underwater volcanic activity. Which they don’t mention.
” Antarctica data is of necessity being conducted well away from prying eyes in the mainstream media. “
Everything you need to know.
“Scientists Struggle to Understand Why Antarctica Hasn’t Warmed for Over 70 Years Despite Rise in CO2”
Greeniacs Struggle to explain away Why Antarctica Hasn’t Warmed for Over 70 Years Despite Rise in CO2
There, fixed it
Not warming is a sure sign of Global Warming. We are all going to die!
We all know why.
The same reason why with “rising sea levels”, politicians and celebrities are still buying ocean front property.
Yeah, because they’re completely baffled. A little green will make ‘em smarter.
Maybe because the two aren’t really connected after all???
Because in Antarctica, CO2 IS A SOLID................
Stopped reading when I saw the term settled science.
Just ask Swiftboat Rear Admiral John F’ing Kerry, he has all the answers.
The models are wrong simply due to the fact there’s no computing power available to include the effect of clouds.
A study by NASA showed that the massive amount of ice being deposited in Antarctica far out weighs any losses by glaciers.
The reason is simple, but it involves these obscure things called “physics” and “real science” (namely CO2 absorption spectra). Something these idiots “scientists” apparently know nothing about.
Actually, the term is in quotation marks - meaning that the author is disparaging the term. The science is being performed out of sight to not run afoul of the global warming catastrophists.
Earth has repeatedly warmed (& cooled) in the past, including an increase in CO2 — way before humans burnt stuff. When it did, poles always, always warm faster than mid regions. This is why warming decreases incidence of violent storms.
So, if the “climate experts” say that earth is warming but poles are not, perhaps it is because >90% of the thermometers are in invalid locations. Temp measurements are rigged to push global warming panic, and increase $$ to be skimmed.
Will they get a special grant to help them figure it out ,D’oh
“double down on lying”
Yes, this.
Some of the lying that has been done in non arctic/antarctic regions is that development around historic measurement points is affected by said development.
However, since no development occurs in Antarctic measurement points, this would be data that is consistent over time, so one could easily conclude if the most pristine measurements show no increase, maybe there is no increase in temperatures over time.
Therefore this data must be hidden, because it exposes lies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.