“unanimously that there was no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election”
Isn’t “widespread” a subjective adjective, subject to the opinion of whomever makes the comment? Seems to me that ANY fraud should be unacceptable and should be the basis of investigations and prosecutions. Using “widespread” as the “standard” for investigations is what these people have using to get away with fraud and corruption they commit in the elections . . .
Especially true since this was a Fulton County grand jury seated by a politically motivated idiot county attorney.
So they make a statement there wasn’t “widespread” fraud, because, in fact there was focused monumentally provable election fraud within Fulton County alone. Enough to tip the Electoral State vote. Precisely 12K plus votes in excess of the loss Biden had before the fraud count/reruns and reruns of the same “ballots”.... to get to that numeric “vote” win.
This is the trick- they cannot address widespread, because it was clearly overwhelming in Fulton County, about which they say....nothing. Cute trick.
They “won” by only 10,000 “votes”, right? But yes it was widespread to achieve that paltry margin.