Scientific American fell into the political hole 20 years ago. Now it’s the two “serious” publications. Where can any real scientist get published now? Substack?
Something like substack might work... but since we’d also want perr review, there should be the ability for members to give feedback with a rating. As each member gets more respected, their review might carry more weight than some unknown. This would result in a crowdsourced peer reviewed site where everyone could publish but only the ‘good stuff’ would float to the top.
>>Scientific American fell into the political hole 20 years ago. Now it’s the two “serious” publications. Where can any real scientist get published now? Substack?
It is virtually impossible to get published in a so-called “peer-reviewed” science journal if you deny Darwinism and/or the climate prophets.
Mr. Kalamata