Posted on 04/21/2023 6:12:39 AM PDT by Patriot777
Being witness to the approach my spouse’s doctor will use to address a gastrointestinal issue and thus stop months of bleeding and pain, I have realized that the same method may prove successful in the treatment and thus cure of cancerous conditions involving tumorous growths within and without the body: banding or cinching off the offending tissue.
Surgically cutting cancerous lesions or growths leads to an immediate defensive response by the malignant body—which is to eject cancerous cells into the bloodstream and thus cause spread in many other parts of the body.
Simply cinching off or banding off the tissue and blood supply will not allow for this; the malignancy as it then lacks oxygen / blood quickly begins to shrivel and die, and the human body’s killer T-Cells (lymphocytes) take care of the rest, attacking the foreign entity and destroying it.
Billions and likely trillions of dollars made by the pharmaceutical industry will go up in flames, as well as any medical personnel who subscribe to Gates’ Final Solution or those unwilling to save human lives at the expense of maybe living within more humble means.
Understandably, some cancerous growths are attached at multiple levels and sides at a real mess to deal with, but banding and then cauterizing the malignancy with the use of microscopy has also been used in non-malignancy procedures involving brain injury.
But then big pharma won’t be able to make billions of dollars slowly killing people off with their ‘medicine’.
I’m sure this works in some cases as I’ve seen this described in medical journals as an intervention that they can do for a certain types of cancer, but I do know that many cancers are generating and unusual amount of growth serum hormone into the tissues around it, if you clinch off the blood supply to it the blood flow is quickly restored and the cancer will spread much quicker and become even more aggressive and resistant to drugs and cancer Treatments such as radiation. Some of these cancers act like some sort of living creature like a bacteria or a virus or a parasite. It makes many people wonder if there is some kind of underlying mechanism that we just don’t understand well enough to have the problem on, what they found is is if they hit a cancer with multiple interventions stuff that doesn’t work alone will have a devastating Curative effect on the cancer. Example cutting off the blood flow and hitting it with chemo and radiation combined will wipe out many cancers. There are some cancers that do not have major arteries or blood vessels as they are in the systems that do not require this form of blood flow, example leukemia, example small cell lung cancer, Etc
I’ve had 5 friends who beat cancer with fenbendazole. Nothing cheap will ever be considered as long as there are big bucks for the drug companies to be made.
There is a freeper whose wife was cured of glioblastoma (I think it was) using Fenbendazole. Can’t remember his handle, but he swears that’s what did it after she was told nothing could be done.
I hope I am mistaken about this, and I hope you are correct in your understanding, but from what I remember, cancer doesn't work that way.
I have tried to keep up with cancer research for many years, and my recollection is that Dr. Judah Folkman did a great deal of research on this issue.
What I recall from his research is that when you have a large tumor mass, you already have smaller islands of cancer cells spread throughout the body, but their activity is kept under control by chemicals secreted by the main mass which suppress their growth.
Folkman tried to discover the suppression chemical with the idea that he could develop it into a cancer treatment.
My fear is that when you choke off the blood supply feeding the mass, you may still have the same effect you would get from cutting it out. If the main mass is what is keeping the smaller islands of cells in the rest of the body under control, when it dies, that suppression will also cease, and then the other cancer cells elsewhere will start growing.
Again, I hope this isn't the case, but that is what I recall learning years ago.
The most promising methodology i've seen out there is provoking immune responses against the cancer cells. I've read that an Israeli company has been claiming a lot of success using this approach.
Old timers have done this with ingrown feathers on candies and tumors on birds for ages.
It is also a method used to castrate farm animals.
Sounds like it ought to be useful to collect in one (or a couple) locations the anecdotal info from each survivor as to what supplements they took with the fenbendazole, when they took them, amounts, their diet while doing so, on-going treatments or medications they were on concurrently, &etc. If there are enough detailed reports, that mightreveal some common pattern, possibly more than one, since humans have genetic variations. Could prove to be a useful resource if it had a bit of structure and was anonymized for privacy.
It may be a new approach for tumors, but we castrated calves that way for years. Special pliers to open an extremely heavy rubber band with a tiny opening. Cuts off the circulation, the tissue dies and falls away. No apparent pain after the initial application, and a healthy young steer in about two weeks.
That is what we typically did, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.