Posted on 04/22/2023 6:37:28 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel
Kind of vanity.
Look at this disgusting YouTube piece that popped up in my suggested tonite. It’s from today.
Bottom line, host, guests, and commenter on U2 all gleeful about white woman getting beat down for using the only forbidden word in all the world.
These people are ALL DISGUSTING.
But not shocking given they also let the riots go on endlessly for less reason.
This is what we deal with, people. Disgusting immoral miscreants like this. And I don’t mean the black thug who beat her.
Whatever your color, if you have ever been one, you will never forget it.
That gives me leave to use the word whenever I feel like it.
Yes, gossip that gets people killed is just lame. Hitler was just lame, because he only spread the word that Jews should be killed, but he never killed them himself. He’ll be in Heaven, because his sins are insufficiently wrong.
Stalin as well.
Mao as well.
Those are just lame people who used words that others acted upon to murder.
The woman who was harmed was not guilty of gossip, at least in that situation, but the person who made the accusation that riled up the person harming her did.
I guess you are not going to answer my question to you- I’ll try one more time
WHERE did the woman in the article who got beat down by a mob gossip? Where did she tell lies that caused the deaths of others? Where? None of what you describe happened-
what accusation?
I’ve answered that question. She wasn’t the one in that situation guilty of gossip. She was accused by a false accuser of the wrong that was decided to be meted out physically by an angry person who decide to try and murder her.
The person who accused the womanto the violent person that that woman used the n-word, however, is as guilty of the act of violence as the person who meted out the violence.
Whites should be carrying loaded weapons, and immediately use them for lethal self-defence.
The accusation that the n-word was used. It was not used, so that is slander and gossip. The person who made the false accusation is as guilty as the person meting out the violence.
You can disagree all you want and it’s obviously to me that you won’t change your mind. In principle, in your mind, the Hitlers, Stalins and Maos are less guilty of what they fomented than the militaries that carried out actions based on their leader’s words.
You are simply rejecting a biblical principle when doing so or, at least, carrying a different understanding of what is taught.
Be on the lookout, you bet. From my other life I learned to simply avoid the public as much as possible. It’s a rarity but when I go to a restaurant, I’ll pick the seat that has a view of the door with a wall to my back.
[[In principle, in your mind, the Hitlers, Stalins and Maos are less guilty of what they fomented than the militaries that carried out actions based on their leader’s words.]]
Do NOT tell me what i think and dont think- ok? You are flat out wrong-
[[The accusation that the n-word was used. It was not used, so that is slander and gossip.]]
ok- I assumed you were talking about the woman who got beat
[[You are simply rejecting a biblical principle when doing so]]-
Nope again- do not tell me what i believe and dont’ believe- Everything I’ve said has been in line with the premise that bearing false witness is as bad as the murderer- I was merely pointing out to you that the woman,- who was beat whom we were discussing right from the start, did not gossip- did not bear false witness- did not deceive anyone-
You have a nasty habit of falsely accusing people of things jonty- You did it twice to me in this thread- and what you said was pretty nasty really- ive seen your discussions many times-
You need to be a lot clearer of what you associate.
This started as a debate that apparently the white woman was “gossiping” or “slandering” the black woman.
Now, after all these posts, you say your Bible references are targeted at some person in the recording who seems to “accuse” and instigate beating. Not the whites woman.
Could’ve been avoided if you’d stated that first, rather than the natural progression that “words hurt and cause injury” was meant for the white woman, which didn’t make sense. N word is not slander nor gossip. Its name-calling. See?
We all thought you meant the white woman was violating this principle.
BTW, it’s not clear at all what happened BEFORE this film or who is saying what. So I can’t vouch for your contention here.
I’m going by your stated principles that words are less harmful that actions. The Bible doesn’t teach that, but you did.
If words are less harmful than actions, that Hitlers, Stalins, Maos are less of guilty of what happened because all they used were words.
I’m just saying the Bible teaches otherwise. Words have the same weight as the actions for the consequences it leads to. If I lie, and somebody gets harmed, I am as guilty of the harm done as the person who did the harm.
Disagree with that and you’re disagreeing with the Bible, which you are free to do. I’m not going to change your mind on the matter.
I have not falsely accused you of anything. You said that somebody who spread gossip is less harmful than the ones who act on the words.
All I said that they Bible teaches words are the equivalent to actions, in the consequences they lead to. You disagreed with that.
I wasn’t talking about racial words themselves, but somebody accusing somebody falsely of using racial words, which leads to the beating or murder of the person by a hostile actor.
I said the false accusation was equivalent to the actions. I was not referring to the use of the word itself, but the accusation to the use of the word.
From what I saw in the video it was a black woman who accused the Hispanic woman of using the n-word, that resulted in her beating at the hands of a black women with murder on her heart.
The Hispanic woman may have used, off-camera, the N-word, I do not know. You and I are in agreement that using hostile words themselves are not worthy of physical beatings. We are in agreement with this.
If I misunderstood you, I apologize. It seemed to me that you said that false gossip or slander that leads to harm is less weighty in guilt that the physical actions that lead to harm. I was only saying that the Bible doesn’t teach that.
If you slander somebody and harm results to them, you are as guilty of the harm done as the person who did the harm.
That’s all I was saying.
[[I wasn’t talking about racial words themselves, but somebody accusing somebody falsely of using racial words, which leads to the beating or murder of the person by a hostile actor.]]
You should have stated that from the beginning- i assumed you were talking about the woman who got beat - that is where the confusion started- i didnt hear her say anything even remotely close to being gossip
[[Disagree with that and you’re disagreeing with the Bible, which you are free to do. I’m not going to change your mind on the matter]]
Again- everything I’ve posted is in agreement with GOSSIP and Slander with malice bearing false witness etc being equated murder- so you can stop with the accusation that i must think hitler, mao etc were swell figures-
[[You said that somebody who spread gossip is less harmful than the ones who act on the words.]]
NOPE- i never said anything even close to that!-
[[The Hispanic woman may have used, off-camera, the N-word, I do not know. You and I are in agreement that using hostile words themselves are not worthy of physical beatings. We are in agreement with this.]]
Yes- we are in total agreement with that- I assumed at the beginning you were talking about the woman who got beat- i see now you meant, and probably thought that i knew, the discussion was about the woman who lied about the hispanic woman- our signals got crossed-
[[ It seemed to me that you said that false gossip or slander that leads to harm is less weighty in guilt that the physical actions that lead to harm.]]
Not at all- again-
I’ll call it a day- late- havent been well- and too tired to continue tonight
Take care.
Sleep well.
Fake vid, IMHO
Even “Sheets” Byrd had an interview where he expressed the same explanation.
Carry a revolver and disappear quickly.
G Gordon Liddy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.