lying with statistics is a skill.
and excluding results you don’t like is par for the course.
but the study did say this
The proportion of vaccinated persons admitted to the ICU was similar to that among unvaccinated persons (505 [19.5%] vs 1961 [21.7%], respectively; P = .13), as were proportions for in-hospital death (216 [10.1%] vs 802 [9.9%], respectively; P = .89). Median length of stay in vaccinated persons was shorter (median, 4.3 days [IQR, 1.9-8.9] vs 4.6 days [IQR 2.3-9.3], respectively) (Table 1). On multivariable analysis, vaccination was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of severe disease (ie, ICU admission or death) (aRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65-1.07; P = .16) (eTable 5 in the Supplement). The sensitivity analysis using the propensity score–matched cohort included 2000 vaccinated and 2000 unvaccinated patients (eTable 6 in the Supplement). Results from the analysis of this cohort were similar to the primary model; vaccination was not significantly associated with reduced risk of severe disease (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59-1.10; P = .16; full model not shown).
which shows there are not statistically meaningful differences.
besides who knows how many of the vaxxed have already died suddenly.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Proof that the Vaccines Were a Military-Backed Countermeasure, semimojo wrote: |
| Depends what you consider effective.
"In this cross-sectional study of US adults hospitalized with COVID-19 during January 2022 to April 2022 (during Omicron variant predominance), COVID-19-associated hospitalization rates were 10.5 times higher in unvaccinated persons and 2.5 times higher in vaccinated persons with no booster dose, respectively, compared with those who had received a booster dose. Compared with unvaccinated hospitalized persons, vaccinated hospitalized persons were more likely to be older and have more underlying medical conditions." |
The study you cite is completely comprimised - it's merely backside covering bought and paid for by CDC/Pharma and NIH.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Yousey-Hindes, Lynfield, Sutton, Talbot, and Meek reported grants from US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the conduct of the study. Dr Anderson reported grants from Pfizer, Sanofi, GSK, Janssen, MedImmune, Regeneron, PaxVax, Micron, and Merck as well as personal fees from Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi, GSK, Janssen, Medscape, Kentucky BioProcessing Inc, and WCG and ACI outside the submitted work; additionally, his institution has also received funding from the National Institutes of Health to conduct clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines. Drs Reeg and Kohrman reported grants from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services during the conduct of the study. Drs Billing and Shiltz reported grants from the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CTSTE) and the CDC Dr Schaffner reported grants from CDC during the conduct of the study as well as personal fees from VBI Vaccines outside the submitted work. Drs Hill and George reported grants from CSTE during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This work was supported by the CDC through an Emerging Infections Program cooperative agreement (grant CK17-1701) and through a CSTE cooperative agreement (grant NU38OT000297-02-00).
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: CDC was involved with the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2796235
Nope, sorry, wrong.
This was right after the (completely bogus) PCR test was recalled but still used, with additional guidance from the CDC that considered jab status beyond the test results in the diagnosis of Covid.
Totally intended to gin up the false narrative, with massive payments to hospitals for cooperating.