Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael.SF.

Van Ark is a Wisconsin state case, if I am not mistaken.


68 posted on 05/26/2023 7:55:53 AM PDT by batazoid (me )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: batazoid
I have not read the article you referenced (yet), but have read others on the subject that are in agreement. I also was reading a piece written for the Harvard Law Review (if memory serves). The author discounted "Law of Nations' by Vittal because: "It had not yet been translated" (from the original French) at the time of the writing of the Constitution. She ignored the fact that three copies were held by Founding Fathers (Madison, Jefferson and Franklin), two of whom were fluent in French (Not sure about Madison).

I didn't finish the article after I saw that.

69 posted on 05/26/2023 8:13:31 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ( Biden-Fetterman in ‘24: It's a no brainer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: batazoid
That was my mistake. I said "Van Ark", I confused it with "Wong Kim Ark".

Van Ark was indeed Wisconsin. Wong Kim Ark was a SCOTUS case regarding a man born in San Francisco.

70 posted on 05/26/2023 8:19:31 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ( Biden-Fetterman in ‘24: It's a no brainer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson