My main question is, just how many of these current and previous (100's of years) discoveries will now have to be reinvestigated and reclassified now that that PhD level 'expert' declared we cannot determine whether a skeleton is a man or a woman. Perhaps everything should now have a gender asterisk *TBD (to be determined).
Many, many moons ago I had a double college major if Spanish and Archaeology. I eventually learned that unless you are the PhD professor, archaeology is no way to fund a mortgage, or any other bills. I did get to work excavating an ancient Mayan city in Central America. I can't wait to read all those links
Is king tut a female black warrior yet?
My pleasure, and thanks for those observations. There are nitwits who think archaeologists are treasure-hunters who pocket all the thousands of tons [sic] of gold and gems just hiding a short distance under the surface. It's really done for the love of the game, as it were.