[1of10]

“no ethics review”

Now there is a clue.
We have a real problem the funding to findings pipeline.

How is fixed .... I don’t know.

[BradyLS]

A crazy leftist murdered her husband with fish tank cleaner and tried to pin it on Trump for mentioning hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness in combatting ronaviruses. (It’s found in the tank cleaner but not in safe, prescripted medical dosages.)

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Wow...

1. “no ethics review”
2. “unusually small reported variances in baseline variables, interventions and outcomes”
3. “no mention of the countries or hospitals that contributed to the data source and no acknowledgments to their contributions.”
4. "data that was reportedly from Australian patients did not seem to match data from the Australian government"

Other than those few problems, it was a rock solid study.

[ransomnote]

PING

[Gene Eric]

Let’s never forget the diabetes connection made to SARS — a relatively sudden respiratory issue (i.e., 3-14 days). Not exactly the systemic cause fatality for the diabetes demo.

Early on, I stumbled upon a study that linked diabetes meds to the increased ACE expression that attracts SARS. The links soon enough stopped working.

[DocRock]

Bookmark