Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ScaniaBoy

And that was after tens of billions of doses had been taken worldwide for a number of maladies and the drug had exhibited an outstanding safety profile. Their finding was absolutely preposterous on its face. But, like apologies, retractions and corrections in the NYT buried at the bottom of page 47, the damage from the false p1 story that they sought was accomplished.


12 posted on 06/04/2023 6:11:15 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (I don’t like to think before I say something...I want to be just as surprised as everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ProtectOurFreedom
Their finding was absolutely preposterous on its face.

Absolutely! And therefore the editor of Lancet must also be held responsible!

(They published another paper in NEJM, but that was not on HCQ or IVM, but that was also retracted.)

13 posted on 06/04/2023 6:15:30 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson