Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

30%...are you kidding me. I'll bet it was closer to 80% to 90%...
1 posted on 07/18/2023 7:34:01 PM PDT by Beave Meister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Beave Meister

If the NY Slimes admits to 30% the real percentage is more like 80%.


2 posted on 07/18/2023 7:36:14 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

“30%...are you kidding me. I’ll bet it was closer to 80% to 90%...”

I agree. The CDC was doing everything they could to scare the people into taking the shot.


3 posted on 07/18/2023 7:36:47 PM PDT by Parley Baer (WI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

LOL, I didn’t read your. Obviously I agree with you though. 🙂


4 posted on 07/18/2023 7:37:05 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister
The NYT performed an obvious calculation error which I describe in a post below, but yes the number is totally a fabrication even when correctly calculated:

The NYT article is titled as follows:

US Covid-19 deaths overcounted by nearly a third – New York Times

But that's incorrect based on the information in the article. 30% of deaths classified as resulting from "Covid" were, upon review, deemed to be deaths from other primary illnesses. The paper says that's 'nearly a third' so I'll use the NYT terminology elsewhere.

So let's say two thirds of the deaths are now said to be the result of a primary respiratory illness. End Result According to the records review: One third of supposed "Covid" deaths were from non-primary 'Covid' and two thirds were supposedly from, primarily, 'Covid.' (But the 'Covid' test was invalid so....)

One third is 50% of two thirds.

The NYT article title should have read "US Covid-19 deaths overcounted by nearly 50%".

Running the numbers for a more precise percentage, using the NYT stated data of 30% misclassification of "Covid" deaths means that Covid-19 deaths were overcounted by 43%.

That overcount number is no doubt still far too low, and the test is invalid, but we can see a little more of 'What caused people to be counted as dying from "Covid' during the plandemic.


5 posted on 07/18/2023 8:07:05 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

The “New Math” strikes again! Talk about a “resurrection”!!


6 posted on 07/19/2023 2:56:06 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Figures )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

This is a modified limited hangout.


7 posted on 07/19/2023 2:56:46 AM PDT by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

seventy percent of 1,134,710 is still almost 800,000.


8 posted on 07/19/2023 4:17:58 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

Probably 94% based on the PCR test results.


9 posted on 07/19/2023 4:25:06 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson