NASA’s need to get more Data on the Van Allen Belts before a manned mission can be accomplished
Good thing for NASA the Van Allen belts waned from 1969 thru 1972.
This looks like a push to start the claims that we never went to the moon.
It’s not impenetrable. We did it a bunch of times.
Too bad climate change is destroying the Van Allen Belt. /s Who wants a research grant to study the effects of anthropogenic climate change on the Van Allen Belt?
I’m just here for the Whoopi pics.
I am not able to work out if the “Moon landing was a hoax” people really believe their nonsense or if they are just pretending to believe it.
We should nuke the belts.
Yes, I know. We've been there.
“This may explain why we never sent a Chimpanzee through the Van Allen Belts. “
We sent humans!
Moronic equivalency.
Comparing charged particle radiation with gamma radiation.
Do you realize light is also radiation? So do you live in the dark to avoid ‘dangerous’ radiation?
Did you hide from your television set as a child? That was illuminated by Van Allen Belt-type charged particle radiation.
Putin Troll. Get outta here with your KGB Disinformation and Demoralization campaign.
Anthropomorphic Belt Change! Our fault, buy an EV!
More proof that God took great care during the creation to protect and to position the Earth. Yet another demonstration that Creation is rational.
Another factor that makes Earth what it is and that is often ignored when claiming some body orbiting some star is “Earth like”.
All the factors that make Earth “Earth like” are necessary for life on Eath being as it is, and without which it is questionable if life on Earth would exist.
Another proof that God designed Earth to be protected from outside destructive forces, like Cosmic Rays............
“that prevents the fastest, most energetic electrons”
It blocks ELECTRONS. Not living things. It’s blocking part of the solar wind from bombarding us. Jeez, do you even read the stuff you post?
How did we successfully send astronauts to the moon thru the Van Allen Belt?
Or was that a hoax?