Detection of recombinant Spike protein in the blood of individuals vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2:Possible molecular mechanisms

PROTEOMICS – Clinical ApplicationsEarly View ^ | aug 15, 2023 | CarloBrogna1SimoneCristoni2GiulianoMarino3LuigiMontano4ValentinaViduto5MarkFabrowski6GennaroLettieri

[RaceBannon]

AbstractPurpose: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic prompted the development and use of next-generation vaccines. Among these,mRNA-based vaccines consist of injectable solutions of mRNA encoding for are combinant Spike, which is distinguishable from the wild-type protein due to specific amino acid variations introduced to maintain the protein in a prefused state.This work presents a proteomic approach to reveal the presence of recombinant Spike protein in vaccinated subjects regardless of antibody titer

[DSH]

The 187 days seems right by my personal experience following an autoimmune reaction after the 2nd initial Pfizer dose (never did take any boosters after that and because of that).

I'm afraid that the "187 days" is just an artifact of the study, which ended after that period of time. That is, it only marks the time when they stopped looking. If the hypothesis that the mRNA reverse transcribes into a vaccinee's DNA were to prove true, then that would suggest that that person's cells might never stop producing spike protein.

This, in turn, would provide an explanation for the IgG4 immune dysfunction that is beginning to emerge.

A lot of "ifs," yes, but that's why studies are now ongoing. Studies that should have been conducted before this garbage vaccine was "warp-speeded" onto a gullible public.

[moviefan8]

Thanks Trump.

[Wuli]

“If the hypothesis that the mRNA reverse transcribes into a vaccinee’s DNA were to prove true”

The Pfizer claim is that that does not happen with the mRNA that the mRNA itself is not transcibed into the human cell’s DNA and after producing the spike protein is broken up. That’s Pfizer’s claim.