I am always curious why the actual data are never highlighted. If the other side wants to complain about the use of testing use to amplify actual Covid virus via PCR to create a positive test meaning person was considered fovid infected, then to use this study where it says “using the most sensitive test — mass spectrometry” cannot be used to say that the minuscule amount of inert “recombinant” spoke protein via a amino acid chain substitution which would mean it is not the same spike protein must be considered the same — namely irrelevant quantities and I note the time max is 187 days does not imply never stop producing. This is a gross interpretation of a study.
A certain group around here also stated millions of deaths are just a year away. Unfortunately there were sayin that in 2020, 2021, 2022 and now 2023, but just wait. It’s right around the corner.
It gets tiresome seeing people make pretzel logic out of things they neither demonstrably understand — namely molecular biology and simple statistics.
gaslight
It is here right now.
Excess mortality rates increased immediately after deployment of the mRNA treatment on a mass scale. That is particularly noticeable in younger age groups (16-49).
Those mortality rates are still increasing. They are no longer even considered "excess mortality" as the mortality statistical tables are being revised. TLDR? The average life span of persons in the US is dropping.
The "all cause" mortality rates are rising. Note that the rates for age groups 16-49 are rising the fastest. Why?
Life Insurance companies know what is going on and have already made adjustments to cope. Premiums are going up and payouts are being reduced. Follow that money. It does not lie.
Where the lies start is with the comparison of mortality rates for the "vaxxed" and "unvaxxed" populations.
From the Government: Studies? What studies? We don't need no stinkin' studies. The mRNA treatment is "safe and effective". Now go line up for your next annual booster.
From the Insurance companies: Dead Silence. They have the data and the analysis. They know what they need to do. They are doing it.
On the 187 days, it was the cut off for the six month review this group did.
We know the claim in the study is a minimum of 187 days—there was no upper limit yet found for those affected.
None should be producing anything spike related at that point, so anyone producing anything is just bizarre.