Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Anyone ever wonder how many “fossils” it would take for all these years of “fossil” petroleum to have been sucked out of the Earth. And maybe the petroleum is derived from the incredible subterranean layers of pressure and heat. It has been postulated... that the supply is not finite. A thought for discussion, of something else “science” has not gotten correct, and that science has never been a consensus- always to be challenged and reproven.


14 posted on 10/23/2023 1:44:59 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: John S Mosby

Exactly. Petrochemicals are produced by the Earth and various geologic processes. “Fossil fuels” are not the same as petrochemicals (which are oil, gas, tar, bitumen).


34 posted on 10/23/2023 3:23:18 PM PDT by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby

Good post.

You say the “supply is not finite.” That is the common usage. Perhaps it’s a nitpick, but the only alternative I see to finite is infinite. Supplies are finite, not infinite.

It does seem that oil, natural gas, and coal reserves are enormous. I agree with your central point. We have so much, perhaps they are not fossil fuels after all. Regardless, drill baby drill.


35 posted on 10/23/2023 3:31:24 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Required for informed consent: "We have a new, experimental vaccine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson