Posted on 11/03/2023 9:14:22 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Among those who received the drugs, 191, or 0.8 percent, died. Among those who did not, 344, or 4.8 percent, passed away.
Unless there is some other explanation for the correlation then the it seems pretty darn effective.
IBT$$
Can somebody please roll up a few thousand copies of this and shove them into Neil Cavuto’s behind?
and Fauci and the rest
Watson finds Sherlock amazed?
Cavuto would be excited to find Fauxcy there....
As many of us know, early after the outbreak the corrupt FDA/NIH/CDC machine went to war with all cheap alternative treatments such as HCQ and ivermectin, because if an effective alternative treatment were available, the Covid “vaccines” could not have been legally licensed by the government under an emergency use authorization.
And there is no profit to be made by the use of generic, patent-expired drugs, especially contrasted with dangerous drugs like remdesivir, at $3000 per treatment.
These studies cannot be depended on if they did not also test the patients for p450 issues. If I get covid this drug likely won’t be as effective on me but that doesn’t mean it won’t work for others.
They need to do the test that show how the drug gets broken down which apparently is only available to researchers
Once again, Trump was right.
“Once again, Trump was right.”
Does the US legal system know this?
Traitor Roberts?
My 49 year old, obese, diabetic nephew got Covid in March of ‘20. He was in terrible condition in the IC unit. After hydroxy was prescribed, he was home recovering very well ten days later. When Trump was ridiculed and the drug abandoned by the “experts”, CDC and WHO, I knew, then and there, it was a 100% scamdemic.
“Elections” aren’t going to steal themselves...
Also, a cheap effective “cure” that could be easily mass produced as needed wouldn’t justify 14 days, er 30 days, er, 365+ days of mask mandates, etc.
It appears to have some effect on something, but this study, like most, is still based on the fiction that the PCR test was able to distinguish a deadly, coronavirus-based virus with a respiratory spread.
More deflection from the truth.
no zinc?
Your nephew was fortunate that they gave him hydroxychloroquine and not remdesevir.
HCQ for COVID-19
413 studies from 8,604 scientists
529,687 patients in 58 countries
https://c19hcq.org/
Statistically significant lower risk for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance.
65%, 20% lower risk for early and late treatment CI 54-74%, 16-24%; 38, 267 studies
25% lower risk in 9 early treatment RCTs CI -18-52%
76% lower mortality in 16 early treatment studies
Bump to PC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.