Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul46360

I see classic Brownian motion, fluid flow, and colloids combining. Nothing saying nanobots. Just because somebody has an MD doesn’t mean they recognise Brownian motion in a microscope slide. Botanist Brown observed it in pollen grains in 1827 and initially thought in was evidence of vitality (living and swimming of the pollen grains) just like this lady. Then he tried it with 100 year old pollen grains and they “swam” just like the fresh ones did, then he showed it with particles of granite, etc so it did not require an active nanobot or pollen grain.

Maxwell, Boltzmann, and Clausius thought correctly that it was a thermal phenomenon and worked on it circa 1860-1880. Einstein explained it quantitatively in 1905.

https://youtu.be/ernnQJwaKTs?si=Vao_WgMTjfjMOc9n

https://www.ge.infn.it/~zanghi/FS/BrownTEXT.pdf


11 posted on 12/05/2023 9:58:21 AM PST by takebackaustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: takebackaustin
I see classic Brownian motion, fluid flow, and colloids combining.

Thank you! Was getting ready to post the same.

Anyone who's ever looked at something unfixed in oil or water under sufficiently high magnification with a microscope has seen this exact behavior. It is very easily replicated.
12 posted on 12/05/2023 10:15:56 AM PST by verum ago (I figure some people must truly be in love, for only love can be so blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson