Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All

BTW: all cellular carriers have similar text message anti-SPAM measures in place that follow CTIA (Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association) guidelines:

https://fightingspam.ctia.org

https://support.yotpo.com/docs/shaft-and-prohibited-sms-content-in-sms-marketing

https://api.ctia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/230523-CTIA-Messaging-Principles-and-Best-Practices-FINAL.pdf


19 posted on 12/27/2023 12:48:36 AM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Drago

Thank you Drago for pointing this out, it’s something not everyone knows. It’s quite disappointing that Laura Loomer, or whoever composed this original ‘breaking’ news didn’t do their homework.

To those who aren’t aware, this falls in line with the FCC’s Stir/Shaken ruling. Stir/Shaken has been in the works for 2 years and is supposedly finally going into affect sometime in January (deadline has been postponed a few times). The lip service to the public is it’s supposed to cut down on spam calls, (that’s doubtful). However, instead of going after the spamming businesses themselves, what the government is doing is going after the voice service provider, be it cell service or internet (VoIP/SIP), for allowing those spam calls. The bigger cell providers jumped on compliance right away, updated their TOS probably a year ago, and who reads the TOS anyway? It appears that T-Mobile is among some of the last providers to make it public that they’ve complied before the impending deadline.


37 posted on 12/27/2023 6:53:07 AM PST by DataJunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson