Oh, go on with you, you sly prankster, I'm not falling for tricks again. If I did, I'd have to point out that calling me a child with a scatological ideation is the kind of personal attack you were "emphasizing" against not 15 minutes ago.
“Oh, go on with you, you sly prankster, I'm not falling for tricks again. If I did, I'd have to point out that calling me a child with a scatological ideation is the kind of personal attack you were “emphasizing” against not 15 minutes ago.”
Don't think of me as sly; think wily but virtuous.
Setting that aside for a moment, you have been maneuvered into declaring at least one thing you think goes too far; too extreme in terms of personal attack.
You say it is wrong to call someone that speaks like a child a child. At least you have made a moral judgment on something; that is a first step.
It is a kind-of-surprising moral first-step in view of your previous comments.
Congratulations none-the-less.