Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: coalminersson

from the constitution no cruel and unusual punishment


https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/amendment-viii/clauses/103

” Largely as a result of these objections, the Constitution was amended to prohibit cruel and unusual punishments.

As these debates demonstrate, the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause clearly prohibits “barbaric” methods of punishment. If the federal government tried to bring back the rack, or thumbscrews, or gibbets as instruments of punishment, such efforts would pretty clearly violate the Eighth Amendment.


The ORIGINAL perspective of cruel and unusual.


19 posted on 02/06/2024 4:00:13 PM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: PeterPrinciple

you are comparing what is unusual over different centuries.

The point in question is whether to make the death sentence more painful. You say yes, I say no. Your position will lose in any court in the US and with a majority of citizens with IQs over 70.


26 posted on 02/06/2024 4:35:42 PM PST by coalminersson (since )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson