The UK’s Daily Mail is reporting 114 million viewers for the SuperBowel.
That’s globally.
If true, ratings sucked.
Now I’m not sure if that figure includes streaming,
But I’ll bet streaming figures weren’t great either.
And I’ll guarantee you that demos were worse than ratings.
We’ll have to see if there’s any reportage on makegoods.
The Superbowl is almost unwatchable. The number of commercials is insane, and the hype makes me want to heave.
The Wall Street Journal says this year’s viewership should blow out last year’s record numbers, and since the numbers have yet to be released I highly doubt the Daily Mail’s report.
The Chiefs vs. Ravens got the highest ratings of any AFC championship game in history. (55 million viewers.) That hardly sounds like a reason to suspect the interest in the Super Bowl. would be any less enthusiastic.
“The UK’s Daily Mail is reporting 114 million viewers for the SuperBowel.
That’s globally.
If true, ratings sucked.”
The Feb. 11 Super Bowl game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the San Francisco 49ers brought in an average of 123.4 million viewers — the highest number of people watching the same broadcast in the history of television.
112 million of those viewers were tuned into the CBS broadcast — the largest audience ever for a single network. The rest were measured across Paramount+, Nickelodeon, Univision, CBS Sports and NFL digital properties including NFL+. Per Paramount Global, Paramount+ saw record-breaking viewership that made Sunday the most-streamed Super Bowl ever, but exact data regarding streaming views isn’t available.