> Bet there will be less than 10 people in the chamber. <
Yep. There might well be no one there. So Rand Paul would be talking to an audience of zero. But I’m guessing Paul’s goal here is just to slow down or even stop a bad bill.
The tweet doesn’t say what the filibuster is for. But I trust Paul. He knows what he’s doing.
Can’t he demand a quorum from the floor? What I’m looking for is someone with the testicular fortitude to have him yield for a question, presented in twenty parts and with thirty sub-sections. Yeah, I know, but maybe SOMEONE...