Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Oh gawd, what a bunch of over paid chicken littles.
1 posted on 03/27/2024 2:10:36 PM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DallasBiff

Finally, a really good response from us “deniers”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A24fWmNA6lM


2 posted on 03/27/2024 2:19:40 PM PDT by cuban leaf (2024 is going to be one for the history books, like 1939. And 2025 will be more so, like 1940-1945.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: butlerweave

Uh, oh. The socialist bartender may need to be recalibrated.


3 posted on 03/27/2024 2:23:57 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

About time for me to post this again:

For those curious:

CO2 only absorbs infrared light aka heat in two very narrow bands of wavelengths (think “colors” of heat). In those narrow bands, CO2 is almost completely opaque.

Even at only 0.04% of our atmosphere, CO2 absorbs almost all infrared light in those bands within a few tens of meters. Hence, if you increased CO2 by even 10 times, the total amount of infrared light (again, heat) absorbed by the atmosphere would NOT CHANGE.

Think about it like this: You have 10,000 sheets of very thin semi-opaque paper. Each sheet abosbs 0.04% of light passing through it. That means those 10,000 sheets will aborb almost all of the light passing through them.

Note: the math is a little complicated. First sheet aborbs 0.04% of the light leaving 99.96% left. Next sheet abosorbs 0.04% of the remaining 99.96% leaving about 99.92%. Next sheet aborbs about 99.96% of that, leaving 99.88% left. After about 10,000 sheets, only about 1.83% of the light is left. Basically all of it has been absorbed (and likely converted into heat).

Consider those sheets to be about 1 meter thick (that is a gross overestimation — it’s probably more like 10 cm thick, but erring on the side of a conservative estimate). That means your 10,000 sheets are a combined 10km thick. The atmosphere is about 10,000km thick. Hence all infared light is abosbed in the first 1/1,000 of the atmosphere.

How much more light is absobed if you increase the opaqueness of those sheets? Answer: none.

Outside of those narrow bands, CO2 is almost completely transparent. So again, if you increased CO2 by even 10 times, the amount of infrared light (again, heat) would NOT CHANGE.

Now the climate “scientists” try to handwave and “computer model” their way around these basic physics facts. After all, computer models are always right (/sarc). But that’s how the REAL physics works.

Short version: manmade aka CO2 caused climate change is not just a hoax, it is not even a very good hoax for those who know the physics. Unfortunately the level of basic physics education in this nation is basically nil with the exception of real engineers, physicists, and scientists.

Furthermore, why does CO2 only make up 0.04% of our atmosphere? The answer is simple: CO2 is PLANT FOOD. More CO2 simply means more plants and thus more O2 (oxygen). The plants including trees, grass, and mostly plankton simply gobble it all up. “Carbon based life forms” anyone in the class?


4 posted on 03/27/2024 2:32:16 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

The climate apocalypse is always ten years away. Clocks and calendars will have to be adjusted constantly to make that always true.

The current approach, to pretend that all the earlier prophecies of doom never happened, has its drawbacks.


5 posted on 03/27/2024 2:32:18 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

I have found this problem evaporates in retirement.


6 posted on 03/27/2024 2:34:29 PM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

OMG!!!! the whole of human systems will just collapse I tell you. /sarc


7 posted on 03/27/2024 2:35:08 PM PDT by Wuli (ena)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

1. Pick anything. Anything at all.

2. Google “Global Warming effect on X”

If X is bad, global warming is magnifying it.
If X is good, global warming is decimating it.


11 posted on 03/27/2024 2:55:27 PM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

They postulate 2 factors that might cause the rotation of the earth to slow down, neither of which we can do anything about. Just be glad the rotation of the earth is not speeding up, otherwise we might all get flung into space by centrifugal force.


13 posted on 03/27/2024 3:13:21 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

Oh Pleeeeeeeeease


14 posted on 03/27/2024 3:17:23 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Is it me, or all of a sudden have the buried trolls come out on FR like cicadas? It's all noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

Is there anything it can’t cause?


15 posted on 03/27/2024 3:22:28 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

This article is nonsense. If these authors actually have degrees, where did they get them? Cracker Jack prizes?


16 posted on 03/27/2024 3:25:19 PM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff; All

It’s Official: The Leap Second Will Be Retired (a Decade from Now)

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/19/science/time-leap-second-bipm.html


20 posted on 03/27/2024 3:34:07 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████s████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

The leap second has been (will be) depreciated and discontinued.

quote:

Time is up for the leap second. Last week, an international coalition of scientists and government agencies voted to retire the dated timekeeping system, which will officially end in 2035.

The decision was made Nov. 18 during a general conference in France held by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), the organization responsible for global timekeeping.

Similar to leap years, leap seconds are a measure of time that get added periodically to clocks to make up for the difference between astronomical time (Universal Time 1, or UT1), also known as the Earth’s rotation, and Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), which is based on the atomic clock.

https://www.livescience.com/goodbye-leap-second-2035


21 posted on 03/27/2024 3:35:07 PM PDT by garyb (What if you can't trust the voice in your head?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff
"giving more time to prepare (perhaps by simply not having a negative leap second), is only a trivial benefit compared to massive problems from global warming"

This certainly leads to a great idea for reducing the federal budget: Cut all funding for the Scripps Institute for Oceanography, and other similar wastes of time and money.

22 posted on 03/27/2024 4:31:45 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

According to the geological record, we are still in a relative cooling period, barely out of an ice age. There is NO Global Warming to speak of.


25 posted on 03/27/2024 5:52:32 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

So, my cellphone is one minute different from my laptop. And my laptop is also one minute different from the office laptop.

How is this any concern to anyone other than those plotting trajectories or day-traders?


26 posted on 03/27/2024 6:19:59 PM PDT by Don W (When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff; UMCRevMom@aol.com

Excuse me, but the premise is bunk that “global warming” is THE CULPRIT that upsets clock time.

- - -

BEFORE “global warming,” the earth rotation varied in speed, plus or minus amounts, around “24 hours in a day.”

AND, the earth rotation will continue to vary in speed, plus or minus amounts, around “24 hours in a day.”

- - -

The highest point on earth, is not Mt. Everest. The highest point is the top of some mountain along the equator - because the earth is fatter there - near the equator.

Not news, that the earth changes shape, has an axis of rotation that wobbles.

Not news, that the moon also does its own - variable thing.

- - -

What may be news to a lot of people, is:

Water beneath the surface of the earth, moves around because of the gravity of the moon. One of the noticeable areas with that feature, is the western part of the Fertile Crescent - aka The Levant - the rough and mountainous terrain of Israel, Syria, southern Turkey.

The caverns and caves and underground aquafers contain water that is affected by the moon’s gravity.

So there are moments in the day, when water comes forth. A major source of some mysticisms, rumors, and stories of ancient times.


27 posted on 03/27/2024 6:35:34 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff

Our obsession with time is probably one of the things that God laughs at the most.


29 posted on 03/27/2024 7:08:50 PM PDT by Delta 21 (If anyone is treasonous, it is those who call me such.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson