GOOD POINT!!
The democrats use such new laws that WILL NOT pass scrutiny to perform their “repeal to a new position” tactic.
Say that there is a current law A.
They want to change the law, so they propose a new law B, which is the opposite of what they really want...but they write it so badly that it won’t survive court challenge.
Then they ‘repeal’ it by court order.
But that does not mean they go back to A, they interpret the judges decision as meaning that if B is unconstitutional then the OPPOSITE of b must be true- which become the new law C, which is what they wanted all along.
That’s how they got gay marriage.
The gay marriage thing was a fait accompli the minute we had laws on getting married. Equal protection kinda kicked in from there...
With this? 2 of the 4 sections in the original bill would have directly violated the SD Constitution. Defacto allowing dudes on the girls swim team. Kirsti stepped in and put her tiny little foot down and had them write it so that it actually protected girls sports from queers and perverts.
I don’t want her as VEEP. She’s doing fine right where she is as Gov of my second favorite vacation spot.