“...the charges are “very serious.””
Well, that’s good to know.
What...what?
Wonders whether they are gilding the lily a bit here, distinguishing as they are from child pornography charges that are only mildly serious. Or frivolous. Or perhaps only selectively prosecuted?
One thing that must be made clear: here in The Gay State (Massachusetts) child porn charges against a guy when the photos are of females are very serious indeed. But if a guy is found with photos of young boys the attitude is “we must affirm this guy's wonderful sexuality”.