I live in MA, and I didn't even think of that. I guess I've been healthcare'd out.
Which only makes me more frightened of Romney and the Roosevelt Repubs.
So we're back to square one--if not Romney, who have we got with something to offer economically? Jindahl? I don't know of his background.
Yes, Obama’s lack of experience is a nightmare, but when experience equals absolute failure, I look to vote for a different candidate.
Ah, you had me, then ya lost me. You have a president who doesn't have any experience and we're in a nightmare, so you're going to vote for someone BECAUSE they don't have experience? That doesn't make any sense.
Sorry for confusing you. I’m not saying go with someone because they don’t have experience. I’m saying don’t go with experience for experience’s sake — especially the bad kind of experience.
We still have to be discerning. Don’t accept bad experience just because it’s experience. Experience is not the be all and end all of everything. It is just one of the factors you look at. Romney has absolutely none of the factors necessary for president. He has little experience as governor. He is a liar who has no understanding of conservative principles. He is a flaming liberal pretending to be conservative whose acts vary only in degree from Obama. (Romney goes in exactly the same socialist direction as Obama.)
If you live in Massachusetts and you’ve already forgotten about Romneycare, then there may truly be no hope for your state.