I'm glad you posted that, as I've been saying it for years. But I also want to throw out something I thought about seriously for the first time yesterday, while working out with Rush in the background (I don't care for the guy who was on today, prefer Steyn).
Palin is my pick of those who've been mentioned, though I have issues with her, as they say. But yesterday, thinking of the complete inability of Obama to deal with being in charge of the government, I wondered about the lessons we're gonna take from this current situation.
If one must call me a Palin hater or a Romney fan, let's just assume that, for the sake of argument (go on and search away to find how often I've said I'm voting for Palin and how often I've said anything supportive of Romney).
Now, here's what I was thinking:
What kind of experience does Romney have with working with situations that will help him pull this government together during these times of economic devastation?
What about Palin?
I'm a big pro-lifer, so obviously Palin is my pick. I'm NOT talking about any other issue except this one--which one would be better at the helm of our government during these economic times, and why?
While you’re looking back at his so called experience, take a look at what he’s actually accomplished. Does Romneycare ring a bell?
Yes, Obama’s lack of experience is a nightmare, but when experience equals absolute failure, I look to vote for a different candidate.
Palin’s a walk-in if she runs, in politics winning is what counts. T. Kennedy and algorejr. were both half-wits, but most of that was kept from the public so long as they counted on to hold a seat etc. Imagine if Palin were a democrat,,the MSM etc. would be bombarding us promoting her qualifications or sweeping the subject aside, and never mind cause she’ll have ‘’handlers’’, aids etc.so she’s OK.