I went into 2008 with the same feeling about McCain.
Romney is dangerous bad news.
As for an argument up thread that the field lacks any really interesting candidates yet ... Hello?
Pioneers a new communication front in social media, draws not hundreds, not thousands, but tens of thousands to political gatherings -- as in, POLITICS, hello????? Has a past track record demonstrating being one who certainly knows how to kick ass and take names, such as seeing corrupt Republicans put in jail. Has worked with and played hardball with executives of major oil producers, and governmed that had to deal with Russia and Canada, international borders, as a way of living. Also has experienced success in private enterprise and business.
Not to mention that it's packaged in an unusually attractive woman -- if Sarah Palin wore contacts instead of glasses, all hell would break loose. And in case you hadn't noticed or in case your are perception impaired, Palin is definitely smarter than the average bear when it comes to intelligence. Or hadn't you noticed?
No exciting candidates so far ... *rolls eyes* She's right in front of your nose, buddy!
Addendeum to above — AND she calls the push behind the “global warming” hoax “snakeoil science.” That ALONE puts her in the RIGHT PLACE at the RIGHT TIME.
God help the Republicans if they nominate anyone BUT Palin.
I, for one, categorically refuse to support another “McCain.” And the “would you rather have for more years” crowd can $—t in their hat and pull it over their ears.