I’m in Ohio and I will vote for a coffee can if it’s nominated. But, I don’t support any candidate. They are all horribly flawed.
Is there some kind of rule that when the party in power has a wounded, easily beatable incumbent, the party out of power has to run a seriously flawed opponent? It seems to work that way a lot,
What’s flawed about someone like Cain, or Palin (if she ran?)
I can name some but I’m interested in your opinion.
Wisconsin and completely undecided. Perry is great on global warming, terrible debater and on immigrants tuition and the gardisil thing. Romney is slick but has RomneyCare around his neck and flip flops like a fish out of water. Bachmann is looney, Palin is a lightweight, Newt has too many ex-wives and an expensive present one. Christie is terrible on global warming and in another in a long line of RINO east coast Republicans parading as conservative. The fact Mike and Morning Joe are having wet dreams about him is reason enough to beware. Huntsman is another guy born with a silver spoon and the fact he took a job from Obama disqualifies him. Ron Paul is too out theire on foreign policy for my liking. Herman Cain is probably the one I most identify with, I will be watching him going forward. Count me undecided at this point.