The Senate is a terrible option for her. She cannot foist her views into that chamber with anywhere near the success she can by endorsing who she wants to see run for office. She’d actually lose that endorsement power only because she’d not be the political powerhouse there that she is now. In the Senate she’d be one of 100. And if her party is in the minority she would have an even less effective podium to launch from. I have no idea why she would even consider it. It would make her less effective, not more effective.
Just like LBJ, Truman, John Calhoun, Henry Clay or Hubert Humphrey?
Totally agree.
We need a third party. Not Libertarian, Tea Party, or whatever. It is time for a new strong brand.
I now there is a Constitution Party. Maybe, we flood it in mass with people desperate for doing what is right. Set up a platform that kicks out or doesn’t allow people who are lefties that just want to be elected by using the name (aka, RINOs) and lets get this country back on the right path.
Hell, maybe, we nee to just break off a few states and do it the right way. As much as I love a lot about New York, California and Chicago, there is too much that is just damaging to our liberty. We reluctantly need to let them go.
The Senate is a terrible option for her. She cannot foist her views into that chamber with anywhere near the success she can by endorsing who she wants to see run for office. She’d actually lose that endorsement power only because she’d not be the political powerhouse there that she is now. In the Senate she’d be one of 100. And if her party is in the minority she would have an even less effective podium to launch from. I have no idea why she would even consider it. It would make her less effective, not more effective.My biggest fear under that scenario would be that the Establishment in both parties would work together to target and isolate her.
It's hard to be effective when your taking fire from all sides.