I read the whole article. There is NOTHING concrete to suggest he served less than honorably, which is what they’re implying.
It’s wonderful to have people who actually served in the armed forces running for office in this country. So he wasn’t a Navy SEAL. Few people are. Should he not run because of that? At least he served, which is more than you can say for most of our current government in this country.
What a nasty hit piece.
Well other than the lying about his service but thanks for crawling out from under your rock to tell us how you really feel.
Agree.
It depends on your unit and comfort level with where you are serving and whether you really want to move around so much and how long you intend to re-up.
“Never volunteer for anything”.
I read the article, and as retired Naval Reserve Captain, I can tell you that Rep. Peters’ notion of “Duty, Honor, Country” is seriously flawed.
By “shading” the truth of his honorable service, he dishonors said service.
ANYONE who lies about the nature of their duties while in any of the military services in order to enhance or advance their civilian career deserves to be turned away.
So, this was not a “nasty hit piece.” It was speaking the truth about a dishonorable man seeking to advance his career on lies.
Rep. Peters was doing what LIEberals do best: HE WAS LYING!