[Windflier]

You talk about this as though you’re talking about sports. ‘Winning’ seems to be your primary objective here.

What’s the point of ‘winning’, if your candidate is a dyed-in-the-wool liberal with an R velcroed to his sleeve? Do you really think such a person is going to govern much differently than any Democrat?

At least two of the names on your list (Rubio and Paul) should be crossed off, due to the fact that both have already joined the Dark Side in Washington. Electing either of them would be almost as bad as electing the Dem.

[entropy12]

Because when you lose elections, there is not a damn thing you can change. Ask any of those who lost elections what laws they have been able to change. The answer is Zero, Zip, Nada.

I am past satisfying my emotional ego. I want real success & results, I can settle for 75% agenda executed over 0%.

[Din Maker]

What’s the point of ‘winning’, if your candidate is a dyed-in-the-wool liberal with an R velcroed to his sleeve?

Windflier, if you would't ask a question like that, people wouldn't know just how ignorant you really are. After 8 years of hell under B. Hussein Obama, you have to ask that? First of all, there is NO Republican who is a dyed-in-the-wool liberal. And more importantly, there is NO Republican who would have damaged this nation and brought us to the brink of destruction and totally neutered us as a world-power as that sorry, low-life, scumbag, faggot, Marxist Muslim has done. Give me a freakin' break. The voters, like you, for whom Romney was not Conservative enough, and the Evangelical Christians who thought he was not Christian enough, stayed home in 2012 and gave him 4 years of unbridled power to finish the destruction he started. Thank you very much!! I hope, by damn, that all of you are happy.