I don't normally resort to ad hominem displays when debating another Freeper, but you've proven that I was right to call you an ignoramus. That's truly what you are - by definition.
Tell me where I ever indicated that I would rather have the Marxist Muslim over Mitt Romney. Go on - copy and paste my words to prove the charge.
Oh, that's right. You can't, because I never said that. I never even hinted at it. In fact, you're drawing that lying inference to blacken my name and impugn my standing on this forum. Even worse, you're doing it while running away ("DO NOT EVER CONTACT ME AGAIN!").
Instead of confronting the facts I provided you with, and recognizing the hard truth that Mitt Romney's RECORD is ironclad proof that he's a progressive liberal, you shoot the messenger and chastise me and millions of other conservatives for not joining you in your abandonment of everything you profess to believe in.
Don't you get it? The Powers That Be gave you NO choice in the 2012 election. Electing either one of the bums on the ticket was guaranteed to ratchet the radical leftist agenda forward. You'd have to be terminally gullible to believe otherwise, yet there you sit, proving to one and all that such unthinking naivete really exists among self-professed conservatives.
I've asked you multiple times now, to review Romney's RECORD in office, and make the case that he isn't a liberal masquerading as a conservative Republican. Why haven't you done that? Why are you responding with exclamation points, caps, and phony outrage instead?
Could it be that you're trying to defend the utterly indefensible, and that I've caught you out in public as being a boot licking shill for the liberal GOP establishment? I believe I have, which is why you're spitting nails instead of answering the question.
Nice, flier.
Din Maker is stuck on hapless. DM believes simply that since Romney ran on an R ticket, he was a Republican. Well that’s a belly laugh at every level, certainly on every social issue, and on religious freedom, cram down birth control for the Massachusetts Catholic institutions, Massachusetts gay rights— you name it. Romney is and was a liberal, designed by the Din Maker types at the RNC Establishment, supporting some permanently annex of the Republican Party with the Marx family on the Left, who despise all the same things together with Romney.
Obama may be a bummer, Din Maker, but he caused a rally in the congressional elections, if you noticed, and were not too disappointed with the results.
Under Romney, the Party would be dead by now, in those congressional races, instead of wiggling to life with a calvary of candidates who are conservative and ready to knock out RINO’s.
Conservatives on this forum anyway, know better.