Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: golux
Should we care about the violent rape of Juanita Broadrick? Or has Slick Willy made violent rape socially acceptable? And the lesbian Hildebeast should be deemed a hero for defending the violent rape through her "bimbo eruption" squad?

Or the forced oral rape of Arkansas state employee Paula Jones for which a female federal judge who had been a student of Slick Willy's and appointed to the federal bench by him presided over a case in which Slick paid millions to Paula Jones and then the judge disbarred him? How many millennials even know about, much less approve, Slick's track record of forcible rape?

If we "old white conservative Republicans" were the only ones who care about forcible rape of women by powerful public officials, which I deny and the polls of millennials back me up, then shall we accept forcible rape as the "new normal?" When Islamofascists begin gang-raping women here as they are doing in Germany and Northern Europe will we be broad-minded enough to give them the same pass as the media gives Slick Willie? I mean, we would not want to embarrass ourselves by looking hide bound, old-fashioned and overly rigid in our response to violent gang rapes by Islamofascists, right?

I want Trump to nuke the witch in this debate and in this election in every way known to man or beast. That's entertainment. Most of all, I want Trump to make the nation LAUGH AT HILDEBEAST with complete contempt until she has "blood coming out of her wherever...." assuming she has a "wherever." It is also a winning strategy quite consistent with the absolute rejection of cowardly "political correctness."

You apparently consider yourself ohhhhh soooooooo sophisticated for suggesting that Trump campaign in the sorry ass wimpy "tradition" of Poppy Bush, Bob Dole, W, McCain and Moral Monster Mitt Romney. Thanks, but no thanks!

135 posted on 09/26/2016 5:27:34 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Rack 'em, Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk

No, BlackElk. I do not want Trump to campaign in a wimpy fashion. I do want him to “nuke” his opponent.

But his opponent is Hillary, not Bill. He has to nuke Hillary - today - not “The Clintons,” who mean something different to us than to the critical voters in this election.

Yes, I am sophisticated, and I am an old warrior. The problem with “complete contempt” in this case is the perception of complete contempt, which can backfire and make Trump “seem” sexist, racist, and all the other bad things they’re telling swing voters he is.

Moreover, though Trump can be trusted, these women (Flowers, in particular,) cannot. Attention will be HEAPED on them, they’ll take it, they’ll be tricked the way Matthews tricks, baits, and switches; and they’ll become liabilities for Trump and for the USA.... For the sake of righting Bill Clinton’s wrongs? Forget it.

They cheapen him, and I think everyone on this thread knows it.

Anyway, “respect to you.” Have a great debate evening!


136 posted on 09/26/2016 7:55:37 AM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson